Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A (DU) minority view on guns. [View all]Tommy_Carcetti
(44,498 posts)130. The point is that the old canard "Only criminals use guns illegally" is a bunch of malarky.
Jared Loughner, James Holmes, Seung Hui Cho, and now Aaron Alexis. And many, many, many more.
All law abiding legal gun owners. Until they weren't.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
166 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Right, thats why European nations have such high gun related deaths too...
Katashi_itto
Sep 2013
#17
We've tried the way of the gun nut shitheads...it is a manifest failure
alcibiades_mystery
Sep 2013
#59
Yeah, it's no fun when someone lumps you in with a group you have nothing to do with,
Bazinga
Sep 2013
#54
I reserve the gunnut label for those who align themselves with the NRA. Those who block and
morningfog
Sep 2013
#56
Problem is, "sensible gun reform" has become a code phrase for an extreme wish list
derby378
Sep 2013
#118
What is concerning to me is that these are people on the edge whether they use a gun or some other
dkf
Sep 2013
#10
Provide data that indicates more people have been saved through defensive use of weapons
BainsBane
Sep 2013
#36
is it too much ask that gun owners only kill each other and not innocent bystanders? really nt
msongs
Sep 2013
#12
Do you suppose that if such an arrangment were reached, the rest of you
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#24
I disagree - you do not have a right to forms of self-defense that endanger others.
Donald Ian Rankin
Sep 2013
#18
The only appropriate use for some of these guns is to kill as many people as possible and as quickly
Skidmore
Sep 2013
#27
You say "The whole purpose of a gun is to intimidate those who do not have them."
Jenoch
Sep 2013
#109
Not this again. How many times must it be discussed and debunked before this
SlimJimmy
Sep 2013
#141
Since you seem to think we should get Grover Norquist's approval for any policy we advocate...
DanTex
Sep 2013
#95
I observe gun owners abusing their rights: poaching, destroying property, getting drunk and making
Kolesar
Sep 2013
#43
Our *non-gun* homicide rate is higher than many countries' *total* homicide rate.
X_Digger
Sep 2013
#73
except that with cars, rope etc...guns are speciically designed to kill people
gopiscrap
Sep 2013
#77
They were more than willing to push the confiscation myth after these shootings and the elections
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2013
#102
So American people are just more naturally prone to violence than everyone else?
KamaAina
Sep 2013
#101
Every one of these mass shooters was a "legal gun owner" before they went on a rampage.
Erose999
Sep 2013
#108
The point is that the old canard "Only criminals use guns illegally" is a bunch of malarky.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2013
#130
I don't think its the minority view at all, if it was there would be no guns.
1-Old-Man
Sep 2013
#115
And argue the blatant falsehood that the majority of Democrats are against any gun control measures.
Moses2SandyKoufax
Sep 2013
#139
Argue this question until the end of time. All I know is if guns were completely banned
chelsea0011
Sep 2013
#129
Thank you. So true- they just do not want to be inconvenienced. So selfish, and dishonest...
bettyellen
Sep 2013
#149