Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Boy (6) with 3 years of firearms training from father, shoots sister (4) in the face with shotgun. [View all]Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)56. Yes, he certainly did and for it to be ignored by law is unconscionable. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Boy (6) with 3 years of firearms training from father, shoots sister (4) in the face with shotgun. [View all]
Robb
Sep 2013
OP
All hawks and owls are federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC, 703-711
Sunlei
Sep 2013
#23
I was watching out the window one day when a GosHawk picked up a Rooster and took him away
1-Old-Man
Sep 2013
#40
Makes perfect sense if you realize his "I'm always careful" claim is bullshit....
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2013
#59
Actually, in a country where there are more guns than people, that's probably a good idea.
1-Old-Man
Sep 2013
#41
that's it - people with guns in the home should have their children taken away
leftyohiolib
Sep 2013
#5
This is a good poster board for speaking on behalf of the sustainable farming movement...
MrMickeysMom
Sep 2013
#6
As it should be. He is behaving in a way that constitutes murderous abuse. As we can see.
Squinch
Sep 2013
#51
hawks are smart too, they get far away and 'laugh' at humans from their far vision perch
Sunlei
Sep 2013
#38
Jesus fucking Christ...first of all it should be illegal for anyone under 18 to even touch a gun
gopiscrap
Sep 2013
#29
Both misdemeanors..that is so good to know. We in the US would never want to charge a father
Jefferson23
Sep 2013
#43
Or, simply stated, a father who treated his child with depraved, deadly, indifference.
Squinch
Sep 2013
#52
Yes, he certainly did and for it to be ignored by law is unconscionable. n/t
Jefferson23
Sep 2013
#56
Yes. If he had been drunk driving with the child in the car and she was injured, he would be
Squinch
Sep 2013
#57
yep these are the people who are adamantly against same sex couples raising children
Snake Plissken
Sep 2013
#65