Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We are no better than them [View all]Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)9. Jury Results
At Wed Sep 18, 2013, 10:52 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
We are no better than them
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023689028
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Right-wing concern troll.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Sep 18, 2013, 10:58 AM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Incorrect assessment by alerter. Sounds just like every other bog person. Hide because of that.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: It's unclear to me if this person is trolling or simply making a point that a lot of DUers would actually agree with. I think it's better to let a thread like this play out and let this person reveal himself/herself in more posts and threads.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I believe that this poster is stating his/her own opinion, and I do not see a "concern troll" here. Let it stand.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
personally, I think "thinking' in such simplistic and meaningless terms is very revealing
cali
Sep 2013
#19
It is. We should embrace intellectualism, pragmatism, common sense, and nuance.
JaneyVee
Sep 2013
#83
Being a fighter against an intransigent GOP is like banging your head against a wall.
randome
Sep 2013
#3
Your concerns are noted. Please feel free to share more of your concerns and enjoy your stay. nt
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#4
First of all your argument would be better articulated if it were broken down into paragraphs
el_bryanto
Sep 2013
#5
They do it because the fact is the Third Way centrists are the Democratic verison of
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#40
But even Krugman, who has criticized Obama--sometimes unfairly in my view--has come around
Liberal_Stalwart71
Sep 2013
#36
My reference to Krugman had to do with Chained CPI and life expectancy.
WorseBeforeBetter
Sep 2013
#72
I agree with you to a certain extent, but I'm just not that pessimistic. I think Obama has been a
Liberal_Stalwart71
Sep 2013
#74
"I honestly believe that a lot of us are no better than right wing tea party republicans"
WorseBeforeBetter
Sep 2013
#65
Don't you think it's a bit silly to be emotionally invested in a politician?
WorseBeforeBetter
Sep 2013
#32
I always thought that Obama fights behind closed doors not in public. Just because we don't see him
Liberal_Stalwart71
Sep 2013
#37
I agree with #3 as well. I don't think he ever intended on picking Summers, either.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Sep 2013
#38
and now she looks a whole lot more 'progressive' than she actually would if not
grantcart
Sep 2013
#43
I have several friends who work at the Fed and they, too, like Yellen. They think she's much more
Liberal_Stalwart71
Sep 2013
#45
He's a part of the Wall Street Establishment. He does what he needs to be done, but he's not a game
Liberal_Stalwart71
Sep 2013
#77
So we need to be Bush-era Republicans rather than teaparty Republicans? Cool.
cthulu2016
Sep 2013
#49
Let me share what my meager little "walnut brain" knows about Larry Summers:
bullwinkle428
Sep 2013
#59
we are not better than 'them' because we've given up critical thinking
La Lioness Priyanka
Sep 2013
#67
There is a tiny group of like minded duers who do seem to hate most duers, but your OP needs to be
quinnox
Sep 2013
#68
I'm going to make a guess that you were born or came of consciousness since or after Reagan, right?
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#88