General Discussion

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)

5. Having my dog castrated was non-consensual also - I'm sure one would be prosecuted for having a

Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:23 PM

Sep 2013

human non-consensually castrated. Having homeless animals put to sleep is certainly non-consensual and would be a crime against humanity if committed against people. So, I don't think issues of consent apply. Animal cruelty issues certainly would apply if it causes pain or harms the animal. Don't get me wrong - I certainly cannot imagine anyone wanting to have sex with animals. But I'm not sure of the logic as to why it would be a crime in itself apart from issues of causing pain or inflicting harm.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Soldier and his wife, 23, 'had sex with their dogs and posted homemade bestiality porn films online [View all] lunasun Sep 2013 OP

Idiots gopiscrap Sep 2013 #1

I cannot for the life of me imagine anyone wanting to have sex with animals - but are they doing Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #2

NON-consenting animals. Tigress DEM Sep 2013 #3

Having my dog castrated was non-consensual also - I'm sure one would be prosecuted for having a Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #5

Surely, we don't want Rick Santorum proven correct. 1000words Sep 2013 #11

IN your original post you said MORAL reasons. Tigress DEM Sep 2013 #19

I cannot even conceive of anyone even having a fleeting thought of sex with animals. Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #22

Poor animals. defacto7 Sep 2013 #4

Fort Bragg is the Florida of US military bases. I just clicked to see if it was Canadian pongos. Monk06 Sep 2013 #6

What a hypocrite--I imagine Saint Francis of Assisi would have something to say to Miss Facebook MADem Sep 2013 #7

I am not familiar with facebook details. Is there a way to grantcart Sep 2013 #27

I think she can write a "status update" to that effect!!!! nt MADem Sep 2013 #35

~facepalm~ Marrah_G Sep 2013 #8

there used to be an old du saying"This post is useless without pictures" dembotoz Sep 2013 #9

The link in OP has pics of dogs and creeps lunasun Sep 2013 #12

I can't even think of a comment sarisataka Sep 2013 #10

So this is Santorum's "Man on dog"? mick063 Sep 2013 #13

Ricky's been waiting 10 years for this story Blue Owl Sep 2013 #17

Whoa. Just whoa. Inkfreak Sep 2013 #14

"Help our oppressors to have mercy and see the truth"? jmowreader Sep 2013 #15

ROFLMFAO! SomethingFishy Sep 2013 #38

Judging by the size of the assault rifle he is posing with in one of the pics in the article... SunSeeker Sep 2013 #16

It's a machinegun, not an assault rifle jmowreader Sep 2013 #23

Whatever. SunSeeker Sep 2013 #34

Here's a picture of him BainsBane Sep 2013 #18

OMG Tigress DEM Sep 2013 #20

And here is a picture of her snooper2 Sep 2013 #31

And the point to posting her picture is...? Lancero Sep 2013 #40

Foxes and Dogs Can Do That? jberryhill Sep 2013 #21

You can always count on the Daily Mail for some titillatingly disgusting crap. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #24

Which makes me wonder why in hell it's posted here Hekate Sep 2013 #26

And then you wasted more time posting about it. onenote Sep 2013 #41

Those are two truly fucked up people davidpdx Sep 2013 #25

I believe that's technically called ruff-riding. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #28

Ruff! AgingAmerican Sep 2013 #29

The Foxes and The Hounds? Orrex Sep 2013 #30

Doggy style! KamaAina Sep 2013 #32

On a serious note, why is this a "crime against nature" Orrex Sep 2013 #33

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #36

. stevenleser Sep 2013 #37

Fox... Lancero Sep 2013 #39

I'll bet their parents are so proud..... panader0 Sep 2013 #42