General Discussion

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)

22. I cannot even conceive of anyone even having a fleeting thought of sex with animals.

Thu Sep 19, 2013, 12:02 AM

Sep 2013

Although admittedly my too doggies do crawl up on the bed next to me sometimes. But, our relationship is purely Platonic. If an action can cause harm or pain or risk a health hazard - I think it can and should be prosecuted under those rules. I don't agree with prosecuting an offense under the excuse, "Yuk, the thought of it makes me sick." Oral sex was banned in most states until recently even between married adult couples on that basis. But all of that aside. I don't understand why on anyone would want to have sex with animals. And if they are causing pain, harm or a health hazard then it should be forbidden on that basis.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Soldier and his wife, 23, 'had sex with their dogs and posted homemade bestiality porn films online [View all] lunasun Sep 2013 OP

Idiots gopiscrap Sep 2013 #1

I cannot for the life of me imagine anyone wanting to have sex with animals - but are they doing Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #2

NON-consenting animals. Tigress DEM Sep 2013 #3

Having my dog castrated was non-consensual also - I'm sure one would be prosecuted for having a Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #5

Surely, we don't want Rick Santorum proven correct. 1000words Sep 2013 #11

IN your original post you said MORAL reasons. Tigress DEM Sep 2013 #19

I cannot even conceive of anyone even having a fleeting thought of sex with animals. Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #22

Poor animals. defacto7 Sep 2013 #4

Fort Bragg is the Florida of US military bases. I just clicked to see if it was Canadian pongos. Monk06 Sep 2013 #6

What a hypocrite--I imagine Saint Francis of Assisi would have something to say to Miss Facebook MADem Sep 2013 #7

I am not familiar with facebook details. Is there a way to grantcart Sep 2013 #27

I think she can write a "status update" to that effect!!!! nt MADem Sep 2013 #35

~facepalm~ Marrah_G Sep 2013 #8

there used to be an old du saying"This post is useless without pictures" dembotoz Sep 2013 #9

The link in OP has pics of dogs and creeps lunasun Sep 2013 #12

I can't even think of a comment sarisataka Sep 2013 #10

So this is Santorum's "Man on dog"? mick063 Sep 2013 #13

Ricky's been waiting 10 years for this story Blue Owl Sep 2013 #17

Whoa. Just whoa. Inkfreak Sep 2013 #14

"Help our oppressors to have mercy and see the truth"? jmowreader Sep 2013 #15

ROFLMFAO! SomethingFishy Sep 2013 #38

Judging by the size of the assault rifle he is posing with in one of the pics in the article... SunSeeker Sep 2013 #16

It's a machinegun, not an assault rifle jmowreader Sep 2013 #23

Whatever. SunSeeker Sep 2013 #34

Here's a picture of him BainsBane Sep 2013 #18

OMG Tigress DEM Sep 2013 #20

And here is a picture of her snooper2 Sep 2013 #31

And the point to posting her picture is...? Lancero Sep 2013 #40

Foxes and Dogs Can Do That? jberryhill Sep 2013 #21

You can always count on the Daily Mail for some titillatingly disgusting crap. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #24

Which makes me wonder why in hell it's posted here Hekate Sep 2013 #26

And then you wasted more time posting about it. onenote Sep 2013 #41

Those are two truly fucked up people davidpdx Sep 2013 #25

I believe that's technically called ruff-riding. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #28

Ruff! AgingAmerican Sep 2013 #29

The Foxes and The Hounds? Orrex Sep 2013 #30

Doggy style! KamaAina Sep 2013 #32

On a serious note, why is this a "crime against nature" Orrex Sep 2013 #33

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #36

. stevenleser Sep 2013 #37

Fox... Lancero Sep 2013 #39

I'll bet their parents are so proud..... panader0 Sep 2013 #42