Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MuseRider

(35,174 posts)
55. We saw that with his father
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 09:04 AM
Sep 2013

and some of the squishy middle flocked to Ron Paul because of his anti war stance. I could never understand how that happened. Everyone, even the worst of the worst, has to be right about something once in a while but there is a record with these two Paul's. How anyone could vote for someone based on one good thing in a nest of horror is beyond me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He's definitely trying to create a new libertarian coalition by picking off people on the far left. applegrove Sep 2013 #1
That may be . . . markpkessinger Sep 2013 #2
+1 nt snappyturtle Sep 2013 #5
Yup. Adsos Letter Sep 2013 #23
His motivations are, its harder for all corporations to exploit people if they are in jail. Sure... stevenleser Sep 2013 #52
He's getting all the press, but who held that meeting? A democrat, Senator Leahy cali Sep 2013 #56
Maybe he's looking to absolve himself for his Civil Rights Act nonsense with white people. mattclearing Sep 2013 #60
Sort of a trojan horse thing going on with this guy. PETRUS Sep 2013 #20
There are some low information voters on the far left. American elections are applegrove Sep 2013 #21
I agree with you about low information voters. PETRUS Sep 2013 #26
Oh yeah. There are low information voters everywhere. I just meant the ones on the far applegrove Sep 2013 #31
I get you now. PETRUS Sep 2013 #33
There is some commonality among people who like civil liberties and libertarians. applegrove Sep 2013 #44
We saw that with his father MuseRider Sep 2013 #55
Too bad a DEmocrat didnt beat him to it. Vanje Sep 2013 #34
I agree. applegrove Sep 2013 #37
A democrat did beat him to it. cali Sep 2013 #57
Everyone, repeat after me: "The Pauls are not your friends." Hayabusa Sep 2013 #49
The far left and the far right touch to complete the political circle snooper2 Sep 2013 #54
I'd be glad to join that coalition FOR CERTAIN TOPICS where the goals align MNBrewer Sep 2013 #58
Oh, no! Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #3
Rand SamKnause Sep 2013 #4
And if you agree with Rand Paul, you're a teabagger and you hate Obama!!! n/t devils chaplain Sep 2013 #6
What does selling your soul to the devil mean? That something you really, really want applegrove Sep 2013 #7
He is an asshole and no one should ever vote for him, but... devils chaplain Sep 2013 #13
The notion that we should never find common cause with our political adversaries . . . markpkessinger Sep 2013 #15
I agree. I'm saying that if a transaction takes place and someone on the left applegrove Sep 2013 #17
Agreed . . . markpkessinger Sep 2013 #19
No. I wasn't implying you couldn't agree with Rand Paul on some issues. Thanks applegrove Sep 2013 #22
I wish a Democrat would "fool" people into voting for him that way. Vanje Sep 2013 #35
OK, but banksters get full sentencing. PADemD Sep 2013 #8
Hitler loved dogs -- Dog lovers = Nazis -- Hitler was a vegetarian --- Vegetarians = Nazis Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #9
I agree but we should support it as democrats..not by supporting Rand. applegrove Sep 2013 #10
+1 SunSeeker Sep 2013 #12
of course - but if paleo-conservatives and libertarian-conservatives want to vote for it too Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #14
Maybe the Democrats need to take a lesson from Rand Paul Vanje Sep 2013 #36
Exactly. kcr Sep 2013 #45
The bill is co sponsored by Pat Leahy, Democrat. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #53
Holy shit, I actually agree with Rand Paul for once! Initech Sep 2013 #11
I'll bet this is a ploy by the weasel to get more money from the rich people who own Booster Sep 2013 #16
Yes well he is saying something that appeals to most Americans. Rex Sep 2013 #18
"the past few years" is as long as he's been a politician Championette Sep 2013 #28
LOL! Rex Sep 2013 #39
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #47
Is that what you do when you end a sentence with a question mark? Rex Sep 2013 #50
It is wrong and it does need to change. Autumn Sep 2013 #24
I did say even a broken clock is right twice a day Rex Sep 2013 #40
Don't worry folks, nobody will get banned from DU for agreeing with him. Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #25
Anyone wanna buy a clock? johnp3907 Sep 2013 #27
Cue the links to how Paul is a racist, an idiot, etc etc. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #29
Congress finally decides to act ProSense Sep 2013 #30
On this, I stand with Rand... Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #32
For once I tend to agree with him gopiscrap Sep 2013 #38
Thanks for showing his good side. bluedigger Sep 2013 #41
+100 applegrove Sep 2013 #42
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #48
You are surprised liberals and libertarians agree on some issues? Barack_America Sep 2013 #43
I have a hard time believing that worm really cares about inequality Skittles Sep 2013 #46
Eric Holder in August... handmade34 Sep 2013 #51
oh gawd MNBrewer Sep 2013 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rand Paul: 'I Am Here To ...»Reply #55