Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
5. My preference is that we not be involved in the Syrian civil war.
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 12:49 PM
Sep 2013

As it stands right now, we are funding, arming, and training belligerents on one side.

And threatening to attack the other side.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As Lister acknowledges, 68-80 percent reject democracy in the Western-accepted sense as a concept leveymg Sep 2013 #1
"We're on the wrong side in this. Both sides - practically all sides, are wrong." ProSense Sep 2013 #2
You're talking about replacing a secular despot with an Islamic caliphate. The cost - only 100K leveymg Sep 2013 #3
So your preference is for Assad's brutality because he's a "secular despot"? ProSense Sep 2013 #4
My preference is that we not be involved in the Syrian civil war. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #5
Well, ProSense Sep 2013 #6
And the rebels are the Mary Poppins Brigade, strewing flowers and singing folk songs? Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #13
Who said that? ProSense Sep 2013 #15
Can I check "None of the Above"? Or, is someone forcing us to take sides? leveymg Sep 2013 #9
No one ProSense Sep 2013 #10
You should knock off that accusatory "you may not care" bullshit. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #14
Bullshit. ProSense Sep 2013 #16
You directed that remark right at me, so don't dance around the bush. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #23
Right, because your comment implied the U.S. shouldn't get involved ProSense Sep 2013 #25
That is correct. In addition this one can feel the tug of his leash from Moscow. TheKentuckian Sep 2013 #27
A Couple of Small Points, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2013 #19
In all Civil Wars, both sides "kill their own people" As did the North and the South in US History libdem4life Sep 2013 #7
Which American leader/President are you comparing to Assad? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #8
The Syrian Civil War is small change compared to the US Civil War - >700,000 killed. Want to leveymg Sep 2013 #11
War as "small change"? ProSense Sep 2013 #12
How many more people need to die to meet your standards of moral righteousness and regime change? leveymg Sep 2013 #18
You're the one categorizing war as "small change," and why? ProSense Sep 2013 #20
I'm not comparing anyone...speaking to civil war mentality and history...ours and others. libdem4life Sep 2013 #21
The British were ready to intervene on behalf of the South, but backed off geek tragedy Sep 2013 #17
I had not heard that, but incidentally, here is info from Wiki I found interesting... libdem4life Sep 2013 #22
They were considering recognizing the South as an independent nation. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #24
Yes, that would make sense. Thanks for the info. libdem4life Sep 2013 #26
K & R Scurrilous Sep 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Syria's insurgency beyond...»Reply #5