Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DELAY ACQUITTED, SIEGELMAN STILL IN PRISON [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)14. Elena Kagan and her role as a willing accomplice in Siegelman prosecution
From the great DUer autorank:
Elena Kagan - Willing Accomplice
By Michael Collins
Then, when Siegelman appealed his case to the Supreme Court in 2009, President Obama's Attorney General dispatched Solicitor General Elena Kagan to argue against the appeal in November.
Before accepting the case, Elena Kagan knew or should have known: that the U.S. Attorney who began the Siegelman investigation was closely tied to Karl Rove; that Siegelman never benefited personally from the contribution to an education funding initiative; that the case was so outrageous, forty-four attorneys general petitioned Congress; and, that the presiding judge in the case owned a major interest in a defense firm that received a $178 million federal contract between Siegelman's indictment and trial, a massive conflict of interest.
Most revealing, before her argument against the former governor's appeal, Kagan knew or should have known the following. After two charges had been dropped in a 2009 appeal, Justice Department attorneys recommended a twenty year sentence instead of the seven years already rendered. Fewer offenses for sentencing meant thirteen additional years by the strange logic of federal justice.
Kagan knew or should have known all this and more. That didn't stop her from arguing that Don Siegelman should be kept in jail. ...
That judgment is that Elena Kagan was a willing accomplice in one of the most outrageous political prosecutions of our time. Why should anyone ever trust her?
Her nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States should be rejected unanimously.
Elena Kagan - Willing Accomplice
By Michael Collins
Then, when Siegelman appealed his case to the Supreme Court in 2009, President Obama's Attorney General dispatched Solicitor General Elena Kagan to argue against the appeal in November.
Before accepting the case, Elena Kagan knew or should have known: that the U.S. Attorney who began the Siegelman investigation was closely tied to Karl Rove; that Siegelman never benefited personally from the contribution to an education funding initiative; that the case was so outrageous, forty-four attorneys general petitioned Congress; and, that the presiding judge in the case owned a major interest in a defense firm that received a $178 million federal contract between Siegelman's indictment and trial, a massive conflict of interest.
Most revealing, before her argument against the former governor's appeal, Kagan knew or should have known the following. After two charges had been dropped in a 2009 appeal, Justice Department attorneys recommended a twenty year sentence instead of the seven years already rendered. Fewer offenses for sentencing meant thirteen additional years by the strange logic of federal justice.
Kagan knew or should have known all this and more. That didn't stop her from arguing that Don Siegelman should be kept in jail. ...
That judgment is that Elena Kagan was a willing accomplice in one of the most outrageous political prosecutions of our time. Why should anyone ever trust her?
Her nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States should be rejected unanimously.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Brad is telling me downthread that the prosecutors have a review process available.
MADem
Sep 2013
#37
Thank you, BB, I hope the prosecutors get a fair review and get this horse back on the track..
MADem
Sep 2013
#36
President Obama has to begin designating Republicans as domestic terrorists and have them all
Koko Ware
Sep 2013
#2
Tough shit. It's finally time to recognize Republicans for what they are - hypocrites who lies all
Koko Ware
Sep 2013
#24
In the case of Tom Delay, he is a dirty rotten crook, Tom has numerous dirty deeds, nothing was out
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#27
NoDak is 2/3 R's, and almost everyone is a really nice person. You want to round them all up?
Coyotl
Sep 2013
#43
This is world we live in now in the US. Another Republican had his conviction overturned also
sabrina 1
Sep 2013
#3
Both Stevens and Siegelman were convicted due to gross prosecution misconduct.
former9thward
Sep 2013
#5
I didn't disagree with the overturning of Stevens' conviction. Corruption in the judicial process
sabrina 1
Sep 2013
#7
I think Kagan is one reason Obama has done nothing with Siegelman in terms of a pardon.
former9thward
Sep 2013
#8
That is shameful!! I did not know about her role in this. She should never have been
sabrina 1
Sep 2013
#28
I know that Democrats in leadership positions have signed petitions and letters,
truedelphi
Sep 2013
#15
Just fired of my fourth rant about this to the WH. It just feels better when I do this. nt
kelliekat44
Sep 2013
#17
Early morning brain fart. What exactly DID Siegelman get convicted for doing?
Tigress DEM
Sep 2013
#48