Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 08:47 AM Sep 2013

Breaking: Obama administration moving ahead with limits on emissions from power plants [View all]

Breaking: Obama administration moving ahead with limits on emissions from power plants

by VL Baker

A year after a plan by President Obama to limit greenhouse gas emissions from new power plants set off angry opposition, the New York Times breaks the news that the administration will announce on Friday that it is pressing ahead with enacting the first federal carbon limits on the nation’s power companies.

The proposed regulations, to be announced at the National Press Club by Gina McCarthy, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, are an aggressive move by Mr. Obama to bypass Congress on climate change with executive actions he promised in his inaugural address this year. The regulations are certain to be denounced by House Republicans and the industry as part of what they call the president’s “war on coal.”

In her speech, Ms. McCarthy will unveil the agency’s proposal to limit new gas-fired power plants to 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions per megawatt hour and new coal plants to 1,100 pounds of carbon dioxide, according to administration officials who were briefed on the agency’s plans. Industry officials say the average advanced coal plant currently emits about 1,800 pounds of carbon dioxide per hour.

“New power plants, both natural gas and coal-fired, can minimize their carbon emissions by taking advantage of modern technologies,” Ms. McCarthy will say Friday, according to her prepared remarks. “Simply put, these standards represent the cleanest standards we’ve put forth for new natural gas plants and new coal plants.”

Great news that administration is ready to fight opposition, which is expected from the republicans and fuel industry supporters.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/09/20/1240127/-Breaking-Obama-administration-moving-ahead-with-limits-on-emissions-from-power-plants


EPA chief tells Grist what coal will have to do to survive in a “carbon-constrained” future

By Lisa Hymas

<...>

Under draft rules being announced this morning, new coal power plants will have to be a whole lot cleaner than the ones we’ve got today. In fact, thanks also to market conditions, new coal plants might not get built at all. Perhaps most important, the draft rules lay the foundation for a bigger move to cut emissions from already-existing coal-fired power plants, a plan due to be unveiled in June 2014.

In an interview with Grist, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said the proposed regulations for new plants are not intended to push coal out of the energy mix. Still, the standards are pretty strict. The EPA had released an earlier version of them in March of last year, then decided to rework them, but this new set of regs still takes a hard line with coal.

The proposal calls for any coal power plants built in the future to emit under 1,100 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour — considerably less than coal plants emit today, which is about 1,800 pounds on average. The rules are more stringent than some had expected; observers had been saying that they might come in at 1,300 or 1,400 pounds per megawatt-hour. (The draft rules set a limit for natural-gas plants, too — 1,000 pounds for large facilities — but new gas plants already pollute less than that. Some advocates had hoped the EPA would push the gas standard down to 800 pounds per megawatt-hour.)

<...>

These new rules are the first big piece of the climate plan President Obama laid out in a speech in June, one of the steps the administration can take without cooperation from Congress.

- more -

http://grist.org/climate-energy/epa-chief-tells-grist-what-coal-will-have-to-do-to-survive-in-a-carbon-constrained-future/


48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Your post titles are too boring... BootinUp Sep 2013 #1
Obama attacks coal!!!! ProSense Sep 2013 #3
Love ya! JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #4
and coal is Black! Traitor, says whathisface Cornell! Whisp Sep 2013 #10
Worst corporate stooge ever Skraxx Sep 2013 #2
K & R Scurrilous Sep 2013 #5
Wind is cheaper. And zero emissions. grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #6
DOE: U.S. Wind Energy Production and Manufacturing Reaches Record Highs ProSense Sep 2013 #7
Awesome Gfx! Wind at 4 cents/kWh, grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #17
It causes cancer and kills birds. treestar Sep 2013 #19
Keep believing the mythology. RoccoR5955 Sep 2013 #21
Not to mention the wind spills, LOL grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #32
And flying turbine blades are a menace to communities...nt SidDithers Sep 2013 #38
O that's right treestar Sep 2013 #39
Related. proverbialwisdom Sep 2013 #8
Al Gore: New EPA rule puts U.S. on path to solve climate crisis proverbialwisdom Sep 2013 #9
K&R. n/t FSogol Sep 2013 #11
So very little, and so very late. blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #12
K & R SunSeeker Sep 2013 #13
Good. Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #14
Coal is king sulphurdunn Sep 2013 #15
Can these standards be met by increasing efficiency or do they require carbon capture? FarCenter Sep 2013 #16
Utilities will have to use gas or renewable sources because of the cost of sequestration Kolesar Sep 2013 #27
"any coal power plants built in the future to emit under 1,100 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour" FarCenter Sep 2013 #28
There is also a standard for natural gas (1000 lbs), but that is easily met. Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #30
This will pretty much guarantee the rapid exhaustion of natural gas for home heating FarCenter Sep 2013 #31
Ahhh, Natural Gas, so clean...what? There's other dirty "costs" in getting "Natural" gas? What? drynberg Sep 2013 #35
Jesus Malverde didn't say anything like that...eom Kolesar Sep 2013 #48
Carbon capture is a farce RoccoR5955 Sep 2013 #42
That's only because we held his feet to the fire! treestar Sep 2013 #18
reminder to read later/ no text OldEurope Sep 2013 #20
Too little, too late. n/t RoccoR5955 Sep 2013 #22
Wouldn't it be great if ProSense Sep 2013 #23
Which is why I said what I did. RoccoR5955 Sep 2013 #37
Congratulations Summer Hathaway Sep 2013 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author RoccoR5955 Sep 2013 #36
Yeah, if I won that prize RoccoR5955 Sep 2013 #40
LOL! Summer Hathaway Sep 2013 #43
Now see Aerows Sep 2013 #24
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2013 #25
Credit where credit is due. dawg Sep 2013 #26
This is great news! blackspade Sep 2013 #33
"Clean coal"!! raindaddy Sep 2013 #34
Silly rabbit. RoccoR5955 Sep 2013 #41
Good start, lets see the enforcement. TheKentuckian Sep 2013 #44
K&R nt Andy823 Sep 2013 #45
I'd say "Cue the Obama haters to try and spin this as something bad." baldguy Sep 2013 #46
LOL Scurrilous Sep 2013 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: Obama administr...