Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Tale of Two Mass Shootings [View all]MineralMan
(151,338 posts)9. But DU isn't the media, at least as most people think of the media.
Apparently the two mass shootings aren't the same to DUers, either. I'm sure everyone heard something about the Chicago shooting, but there doesn't seem to be any curiosity about it. Who was the shooter? What was the shooter's motive? Where are the speculative threads? Do we not care for some reason?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fair point...So what insights can you share after comparing and contrasting the two??
Blue_Tires
Sep 2013
#29
Yes, of course. No one at all here has been discussing it since Tuesday.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2013
#40
The race and or social status of the victims and or the (presumed) shooters is my guess.
Fumesucker
Sep 2013
#25
Because the reporters and politicians don't want Chicago and similar cities to be focused on
Lurks Often
Sep 2013
#31
Why would racial/social issues on a supposed liberal forum make anyone uncomfortable?
Blue_Tires
Sep 2013
#43
Crazed gunman violence is more of a threat to public safety than gang violence.
SecularMotion
Sep 2013
#39