Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
5. I technically voted for 3.
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:44 PM
Sep 2013

But the definition has to fairly broad. None of this Durbin/DiFi defining journalists as only salaried employees of news outlets. A lot of the best journalists I follow either work for next to nothing or are only freelancers for even comparatively small outlets.

I couldn't tolerate a world where Judy Miller is considered a journalist, but someone like Allison Kilkenny or Rania Khalek isn't.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are journalist shield law...»Reply #5