Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BKH70041

(961 posts)
6. Complicated Question w/ No Easy Answer
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:45 PM
Sep 2013

I'm uncomfortable with having the government define what is and/or isn't a journalist.

For a journalist not to have to reveal their sources is something that is useful. There's people who simply wouldn't talk if they thought what they were revealing might harm them; we all know that. OTOH how many times have journalists just made people up (the "Sources close to the..." thing) to create a story? It's hard to know what to and what not to believe anymore.

But how far of a scope should that extend when it comes to those who refer to themselves as journalist? It may just have to come down to a case-by-case basis. Regardless of the decision, not everyone is going to be happy, of that we can agree.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are journalist shield law...»Reply #6