Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
7. Weak.
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:54 PM
Sep 2013

The problem with the bill you're defending is that it constricts the definition of "journalist". It would essentially put journalism under the official jurisdiction of big business.

There's no crisis in determining who is and who is not a journalist. The courts can already determine whether or not someone can reasonably claim to be acting in the capacity of a journalist-- and they don't need a pay stub from Comcast to make that call.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are journalist shield law...»Reply #7