Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why Democrats Have a Problem with Young Voters [View all]
Ten youths that I know who volunteered and campaigned for Obama and worked their butts off are now convinced that they are going to sit this one out. Endless global war and no jobs are their main complaints. Most of them consider themselves Occupiers or regularly participate in Occupy actions.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/why-democrats-have-a-problem-with-young-voters-20120228?print=true
Why Democrats Have a Problem with Young Voters
RS Politics Daily
by: Rick Perlstein
Then came Barack Obama, and Cecil fell in love. "The war thing was big," he remembers. "I had a friend who went to Iraq and died. Obamas whole opposition to the war was very important to me." He packed up his car and drove all the way across the country to become an Obama organizer in New Hampshire, then Maine, then Vermont. Because he was good at it, he was named deputy field director in Oregon, then one of two deputies in a crucial Midwestern state. After the election, in Washington, he was one of the principles in setting up a major new national progressive activist group.
...
You could call Cecil a progressive. Just don't call him a Democrat. As intense as his alienation from the Republican Party is his disinclination to state any party identity at all. He says, "I feel more attached to a politics of hope and optimism than I do to the Democratic Party"
...
The turn away from party identification has been a long-term American trend: According to Gallup, 40 percent of Americans don't consider themselves members of a political party, compared to 36 percent in 2002 and 33 percent in 1988. But that trend has been all the more accelerated among young people and even more so among young progressives. A study by Tufts University's Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement in the key swing state of Nevada found that youth were 11 percent of registered voters in the 2008 election, but just 7.85 percent in October of 2011 meaning a key Obama constituency in 2008 will have thinned out for 2012. More menacingly for Dems, those same researchers found that in North Carolina, a Southern state where in 2008 Obama scored an apparently historic map-changing victory, Democratic registration among 18-25 year olds was 300,000 in 2008 and only 265,000 in 2011. Republican registration among the same age cohort is about the same. Nationally, Republican youth registration has gone upwhich means that the Republican Party is bucking the trend: right-of-center kids seem perfectly happy calling themselves Republicans, at the same time that young lefties are becoming increasingly chary of being called Democrats.
....
The people running the Democratic Party itself laid down their bet on that question long ago: Take 'em for granted. It makes more sense, a generation of Democratic strategists agree, to plug for "independent" voters in the middle, even at the expense of strong stands for traditionally Democratic constituencies. Jimmy Carter started the trend, deliberately shutting out unions from decision-making in his administration, canceling spending projects on infrastructure, and explaining in his 1978 State of the Union, "Government cannot eliminate poverty or provide a bountiful economy or reduce inflation or save our cities or cure illiteracy or provide energy." Clinton, of course, said the same thing "the age of big government is over" then made "triangulation" -- explicitly positioning himself as an adversary of Democrats in Congress -- the core of his reelection strategy. Barack Obama, as we know, has made such post-partisan gestures the soul of his political identity.
...
You could call Cecil a progressive. Just don't call him a Democrat. As intense as his alienation from the Republican Party is his disinclination to state any party identity at all. He says, "I feel more attached to a politics of hope and optimism than I do to the Democratic Party"
...
The turn away from party identification has been a long-term American trend: According to Gallup, 40 percent of Americans don't consider themselves members of a political party, compared to 36 percent in 2002 and 33 percent in 1988. But that trend has been all the more accelerated among young people and even more so among young progressives. A study by Tufts University's Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement in the key swing state of Nevada found that youth were 11 percent of registered voters in the 2008 election, but just 7.85 percent in October of 2011 meaning a key Obama constituency in 2008 will have thinned out for 2012. More menacingly for Dems, those same researchers found that in North Carolina, a Southern state where in 2008 Obama scored an apparently historic map-changing victory, Democratic registration among 18-25 year olds was 300,000 in 2008 and only 265,000 in 2011. Republican registration among the same age cohort is about the same. Nationally, Republican youth registration has gone upwhich means that the Republican Party is bucking the trend: right-of-center kids seem perfectly happy calling themselves Republicans, at the same time that young lefties are becoming increasingly chary of being called Democrats.
....
The people running the Democratic Party itself laid down their bet on that question long ago: Take 'em for granted. It makes more sense, a generation of Democratic strategists agree, to plug for "independent" voters in the middle, even at the expense of strong stands for traditionally Democratic constituencies. Jimmy Carter started the trend, deliberately shutting out unions from decision-making in his administration, canceling spending projects on infrastructure, and explaining in his 1978 State of the Union, "Government cannot eliminate poverty or provide a bountiful economy or reduce inflation or save our cities or cure illiteracy or provide energy." Clinton, of course, said the same thing "the age of big government is over" then made "triangulation" -- explicitly positioning himself as an adversary of Democrats in Congress -- the core of his reelection strategy. Barack Obama, as we know, has made such post-partisan gestures the soul of his political identity.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
86 replies, 12588 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (17)
ReplyReply to this post
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's easy to blame Obama. This system is so dysfunctional when indivdual Senators can prevent
libinnyandia
Mar 2012
#6
Both parties are in the pockets of the rich. They just serve in different ways.
white_wolf
Mar 2012
#10
My phrasing was clumsy. Most are likely to vote... none will volunteer.
Luminous Animal
Mar 2012
#31
Yes, calling these college educated youths (2 go to Columbia, 2 are at UCBerkeley, 1 graduated from
Luminous Animal
Mar 2012
#3
That's cool. Which Occupy would that be? I'd like to follow their twitter feed and Face Book page.
Luminous Animal
Mar 2012
#16
I was asking for links to the specific Occupy group she was talking about. I'm following 75 or more
Luminous Animal
Mar 2012
#29
The article doesn't imply "that Democrats are moving away from party identification..
girl gone mad
Mar 2012
#15
It is amazing how little political savvy is being expressed here. It is a remarkable statistic
Luminous Animal
Mar 2012
#18
Let's hope that those right wing Republicans will cough up cash for Obama like they did for Kerry...
Luminous Animal
Mar 2012
#14
The difference is, the purpose of the Kerry $ was to put a Democrat in the White House.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2012
#40
Right wing Republicans $110,000 to Nader. $10,000,000 to Kerry. Piss poor attempt
Luminous Animal
Mar 2012
#66
I agree that everyone who involved with Nader's campaigns was wasting their time
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2012
#82
So, you agree that John Kerry should have returned the $10 million he received from Republican
Luminous Animal
Mar 2012
#24
So you agree that John Kerry who accepted donations that were 5 times Nader's entire
Luminous Animal
Mar 2012
#45
Glad to hear that the youth going to have their votes taken for granted and think for themselves.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2012
#21
It sounds like they stand for the right not to buy into the establishment.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2012
#28
The Democrats really need to get some voices on a national platform to steal these issues.
Saving Hawaii
Mar 2012
#48
I actually think pot legalization would play very well nationally, especially w/ proper framing.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2012
#53
replies to this thread are perfect example of how NOT to try to re-engage these kids
ibegurpard
Mar 2012
#39
I'll agree with you there. A lot of us old farts are tired of it, too.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2012
#51
This doesn't mean good news for the Repukes, young cons are likely to identify themselves as Repukes
pstokely
Mar 2012
#62