Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Navy and the FBI fucked up [View all]NutmegYankee
(16,477 posts)91. LOL. Still wrong.
I see you are one of those double down when wrong types of people.
The fact that you are trying to use Wikipedia to counter me demonstrates the title of my first post. You obviously were not familiar (and still aren't). I LOL because you are flailing trying to counter that obvious fact that you were speaking from ignorance (Ignorance: def. The state of not knowing).
The whole guns argument that you try to tie me into - you were having that with Nadin.
Which leads me back to another question. What NRA talking points did I have in my first post to you? I merely corrected your wildly wrong "appeal to authority" attempt against Nadin. Don't make the accusation if you can't back it up!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Uh, wrong. The first thing looked at are criminal records. The prob with this shooter is that he was
Nay
Sep 2013
#12
Which category would you place gay people in? Mental issues, violence or quasi criminal?
jtuck004
Sep 2013
#16
Point of fact, gay 'conduct' got a person OTH discharge, gay identity got
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#34
I heard on the TV that he petitioned to upgrade that general, as one can do after six months,
MADem
Sep 2013
#79
Man. Is there ANY part of the status quo that you don't defend? Any part at all?
Romulox
Sep 2013
#39
Many people have trouble getting security clearance becauses costs employers too much money
JPZenger
Sep 2013
#36
it was a private (for profit) contractor who hired him as they hire many civies, ex. military..
Sunlei
Sep 2013
#47
Are "small and disadvantaged business" subcontractor employees given extra slack?
FarCenter
Sep 2013
#49
the clearance company is probably contracted too and a lot of slackers in those desk jobs
Sunlei
Sep 2013
#53
I've personally been interviewed for three or four times in the last four years.
tammywammy
Sep 2013
#95
Exactly however you missed the elephant in the room which is profit motive, companies cutting
snagglepuss
Sep 2013
#70
what would it take to stop things like this? finding under 10 in over 300,000,000 people
alc
Sep 2013
#61
I think a better question is why squander political capital on mass shootings
sir pball
Sep 2013
#72
The "common sense" Inquisitors have ruled: You are one of Them. Resistance is futile.
Eleanors38
Sep 2013
#114
The Navy and the FBI did not investigate. A Private corporation approved the security clearance.
Agnosticsherbet
Sep 2013
#104
The Navy did indeed fuck up- The FBI fucked up by allowing clearance to be privatized
Marrah_G
Sep 2013
#111