Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Humankind’s Most Dangerous Moment: Fukushima Fuel Pool at Unit 4 [View all]defacto7
(14,162 posts)34. Please help me with the "tends toward" comment.
According to Arnie Gundersen, a nuclear engineer with forty years in an industry for which he once manufactured fuel rods, the ones in the Unit 4 core are bent, damaged and embrittled to the point of crumbling. Cameras have shown troubling quantities of debris in the fuel pool, which itself is damaged.
The engineering and scientific barriers to emptying the Unit Four fuel pool are unique and daunting, says Gundersen. But it must be done to 100% perfection.
Should the attempt fail, the rods could be exposed to air and catch fire, releasing horrific quantities of radiation into the atmosphere. The pool could come crashing to the ground, dumping the rods together into a pile that could fission and possibly explode. The resulting radioactive cloud would threaten the health and safety of all us.
The engineering and scientific barriers to emptying the Unit Four fuel pool are unique and daunting, says Gundersen. But it must be done to 100% perfection.
Should the attempt fail, the rods could be exposed to air and catch fire, releasing horrific quantities of radiation into the atmosphere. The pool could come crashing to the ground, dumping the rods together into a pile that could fission and possibly explode. The resulting radioactive cloud would threaten the health and safety of all us.
Which part of this tends towards hyperbole? The "100% perfection" part, or the "40 years in the industry"? The rest is already pretty well understood.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For example: All that radioactive water? Well, it's mountain runoff seeping....
Junkdrawer
Sep 2013
#4
I wonder if folks these days think that Nuclear Radiation is just a Hoax or Something!
KoKo
Sep 2013
#6
Remember it was the tree huggers who said something like this was very likely to happen some day....
JohnyCanuck
Sep 2013
#16
Right, and TEPCO was warned almost a decade ago that a tsunami would trash
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#49
Requires that we take control of them from private or semi-private public entities.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#64
Ann Coulter claims that radiation is good for you. Let's send her in to clean it up bare handed.
stevenleser
Sep 2013
#50
Fukushima is a giant fucking mega-clusterfuck, but Gundersen tends towards hyperbole.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2013
#26