Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LuvNewcastle

(17,817 posts)
7. That wouldn't work.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 02:09 PM
Sep 2013

Diabetics often keep a little candy around the house to eat when their sugar gets low. Should they not be able to buy it with their SNAP card? Should moms be able to use their card to buy those little bags of potato chips to put in their kid's school lunch?

I know you're just trying to think of a way to keep people from criticizing the program, and I sympathize because a lot of people aren't eating enough nutricious food, but I just don't think it would work to ban certain foods.

I think that the thing to do would be for the government to give big subsidies to vegetable and fruit growers in order to bring down prices. People aren't buying the nutricious foods because they're so expensive and junk food is so cheap. It wouldn't hurt to also give certain foods away to people that qualify at distribution centers, like they used to do with the cheese. Bringing down the prices of the healthy foods and putting a tax on the junk would go a long way toward achieving the goal without banning certain foods to be bought with the cards.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We are apparently a nation of socipaths Demo_Chris Sep 2013 #1
sociopaths kardonb Sep 2013 #6
Yes,,,,,,YEs!!!!!! Cryptoad Sep 2013 #10
Without doubt etherealtruth Sep 2013 #22
No, the people who own the govt officials who can get men with guns to valerief Sep 2013 #15
Buying snacks with food stamps is the reason for scorn ErikJ Sep 2013 #2
It is the reason people think they can stand in line and CRITICIZE VOCALLY AllyCat Sep 2013 #3
+ hundreds of thousands. shraby Sep 2013 #4
Very idealistic. Cons will judge no matter what you say ErikJ Sep 2013 #14
Who the fuck cares what the cons think.... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #24
Cons are voters that can take away food stamps completely ErikJ Sep 2013 #27
you put it much nicer than I. nt awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #25
It is not our place to judge. You are right. But nevertheless a pickle and cheese sandwich totodeinhere Sep 2013 #8
Allow healthy hot foods and get rid of the junk-food food stamps. ErikJ Sep 2013 #11
I take exception to your pontificating strategery blunder Sep 2013 #21
Ice tea is much more effective body coolant. ErikJ Sep 2013 #23
People should be able to buy whatever they want with food stamps as long as it is covered by totodeinhere Sep 2013 #5
That wouldn't work. LuvNewcastle Sep 2013 #7
Taxing so-called junk food has been tried and it's probably not such as bad idea totodeinhere Sep 2013 #9
Agribusiness and crooked farmers won't pass the savings onto consumers meow2u3 Sep 2013 #13
I could certainly go along with giving subsidies to small farmers. LuvNewcastle Sep 2013 #19
Some farmers markets accept food stamps... Blanks Sep 2013 #29
I tell you the shame is in Cryptoad Sep 2013 #12
What task would that be? And what about the gazillions of parents babylonsister Sep 2013 #16
So you are saying Cryptoad Sep 2013 #17
Don't put words in my mouth. babylonsister Sep 2013 #18
Then what "argument sounds too rightwing" for you? Cryptoad Sep 2013 #20
K&R! sheshe2 Sep 2013 #26
Those are my students. LWolf Sep 2013 #28
K & R Scurrilous Sep 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On Behalf of the Kids Who...»Reply #7