Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,501 posts)
3. Yes.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:22 PM
Sep 2013

If it comes down to letting my son die or two strangers die--let's say there's an accident and I can save just my kid or be able to save two others--the two others are toast. No regrets.


I'm also not going to condemn somebody who fails to give his life so that two or more others could live. Or, in the case of somebody who dies to save one other, to judge him a fool because his life was just as good as somebody else's. It's up to them and not some neutered principle to make that decision for such people.

Consider also the Secret Service. Most would take a bullet and die to protect Obama, so you could easily get 3 or more killed to protect him. If Obama's life is just the same as anybody else's, he's obligated to take a bullet to protect his SS agents if it came down to that. I think that would be wrong. Some lives are more important than others.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Of course not LittleBlue Sep 2013 #1
Check out the Gungeon Taverner Sep 2013 #2
They have a lot of delusional thoughts etherealtruth Sep 2013 #17
I don't like reading the gungeon because it rots your brains, and I need whatever bain cells hrmjustin Sep 2013 #26
Indeed .... oldhippie Sep 2013 #33
Your welcome. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #34
not many Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #63
Are you saying I have not many brain cells. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #64
I guess I'm confused ... Bake Sep 2013 #27
You need to start coughing up some links. nt rrneck Sep 2013 #62
Yes. Igel Sep 2013 #3
I think you hit the nail on the head treestar Sep 2013 #51
As I told you in the other thread you started, furious Sep 2013 #4
I think your life is worth more than a murderous scumbag like Richard Ramirez, so my answer is yes. Throd Sep 2013 #5
I'd say the answer is obviously yes. Dr. Strange Sep 2013 #6
To protect ourselves and the general public. furious Sep 2013 #7
Its not that simple... Whiskeytide Sep 2013 #8
precisely. I really have contempt for this kind of sophomoric garbage. cali Sep 2013 #47
The life of a child rapist is certainly worth less WonderGrunion Sep 2013 #9
I disagree Taverner Sep 2013 #10
So the rapist gets to rape and then get psych help. The child gets to be raped and then get money uppityperson Sep 2013 #14
Simple truths can be elusive for some. pintobean Sep 2013 #20
Oh I didn't say there wouldn't be punitive damages Taverner Sep 2013 #21
I am confused. "any one of us has the right to stop it, but not by lethal means" and the raped child uppityperson Sep 2013 #36
Is raping a child worth death? Taverner Sep 2013 #37
And if killing someone is the only way to stop someone from raping a child? uppityperson Sep 2013 #38
By any means. Also, no one is required to assign greater worth to an assailant's life than their own TheKentuckian Sep 2013 #18
That is my nonviolent stance Taverner Sep 2013 #19
Gandhi endorses non-violent means to stop attacks. Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #31
You just decided blueridge3210 Sep 2013 #32
absolute fucking sickening garbage. cali Sep 2013 #48
I like to think that ... surrealAmerican Sep 2013 #11
That is your personal choice Taverner Sep 2013 #22
Worth is a subjective term The2ndWheel Sep 2013 #12
Yes -- juries and judges make determinations of amounts to compensate survivors. FarCenter Sep 2013 #13
Depends on how you define 'worth' it is a little subjective (nt) The Straight Story Sep 2013 #15
I agree with you LostOne4Ever Sep 2013 #16
+100 Taverner Sep 2013 #28
Fucking ridiculous- unless you're talking on some metaphysical level cali Sep 2013 #45
Please don't misunderstand me LostOne4Ever Sep 2013 #54
What would it be worth to Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #46
It would be worth the world to save even one of them LostOne4Ever Sep 2013 #49
"had the people who did this believed as I do, would this have happened?" Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #55
In other words LostOne4Ever Sep 2013 #56
That's a tautological statement. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #57
Yes its tautological LostOne4Ever Sep 2013 #58
The OP asks, "Are some lives worth more than others." Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #59
yes? BOG PERSON Sep 2013 #23
I suppose from a purely practical standpoint, some might be. PlanetaryOrbit Sep 2013 #24
lives themselves, no - same worth. What the lives represent, on the other hand... yawnmaster Sep 2013 #25
Yes .... oldhippie Sep 2013 #29
That question is best asked of a violent attacker. nt Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #30
When the chips are down, yes, and there is nothing unegalitarian about making the choice. Yo_Mama Sep 2013 #35
Absolutely, you take someone like that Castro guy that held those women and rl6214 Sep 2013 #39
Of course. My life and the lives of those I care for personally... Demo_Chris Sep 2013 #40
Yes and I don't like it but it is just reality in America and the world today. FUMCSDLCBDPOS Sep 2013 #41
that's actually not a simple question. At fucking all. cali Sep 2013 #42
Let us know Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #43
We all decide the value of individual lives... Decaffeinated Sep 2013 #44
No. What makes you think it had to be asked? nt rrneck Sep 2013 #50
his post #2 in this thread and all is revealed ... Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #61
Are some lives worth more than others? People and Animals Yes. Cockroaches Yes but with exceptions BlueJazz Sep 2013 #52
Of course your life is worth more than other lives. That's built in to us. dkf Sep 2013 #53
Maybe "All men are created equal," but what they do afterwards is a factor in your query. WinkyDink Sep 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I guess it had to be aske...»Reply #3