Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Breaking: Obama administration moving ahead with limits on emissions from power plants [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)23. Wouldn't it be great if
Last edited Sun Sep 22, 2013, 10:40 AM - Edit history (1)
we could go back in time and pass a climate bill in the Senate?
July 2009:
House passes landmark climate change bill
http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/06/26/us-climate-usa-congress-idUSTRE55O4R120090626
September 2009:
Boxer, Kerry Set to Introduce Climate Bill in Senate
http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/09/28/28climatewire-boxer-kerry-set-to-introduce-climate-bill-in-43844.html
October 2009:
Kerry-Boxer clean energy bill: Chairmans mark and EPA analysis released
http://www.grist.org/article/2009-10-23-kerry-boxer-clean-energy-bill-chairmans-mark-and-epa-analysis
November 2009:
Boxer Statement on Committee Passage of S. 1733 The Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Majority.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=c512ac4d-802a-23ad-4884-2b95a8405efe
Unfortunately, by the time the bill got to the full Senate, it was attacked, kill the bill, from all sides.
Markey Praises Obama Admin. Carbon Pollution Rules for New Power Plants
WASHINGTON (September 20, 2013) Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), who co-authored the only comprehensive bill to put carbon limits on power plants to pass a chamber of Congress, today praised the Obama administration for their new rules on future power plants that will limit the pollution that is driving climate change. The new rules, announced today by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, will set new, separate limits on the amount of pollution that natural gas and coal plants can emit.
Below is the statement of Senator Markey:
The era of boundlessly polluting our skies with climate-altering pollution is nearing its end. For decades, weve known that setting limits on smog, on mercury, on other dangerous emissions saves lives and preserves our planet. Today, the Obama administration is proposing to put limits on carbon pollution needed to stop climate changes that are endangering our people and our planet.
These rules are reasonable. They are feasible. And they should soon be expanded to include standards for existing power plants.
For power producers and coal mining companies that reject these standards, they have no reason to complain, and every excuse to innovate. Because when Congress offered a solution to pass a climate and energy bill that would provide billions of dollars to help power companies develop advanced carbon-cutting technologies, they instead chose to hire lobbyists and kill the bill.
Next week, the worlds most comprehensive climate science report is set to be released. We know climate change is an existential threat that is changing our world for the worse. These standards respond to the moral duty we have to address climate change and provide the clear economic incentives for power producers to clean up their act.
http://www.markey.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=345768
WASHINGTON (September 20, 2013) Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), who co-authored the only comprehensive bill to put carbon limits on power plants to pass a chamber of Congress, today praised the Obama administration for their new rules on future power plants that will limit the pollution that is driving climate change. The new rules, announced today by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, will set new, separate limits on the amount of pollution that natural gas and coal plants can emit.
Below is the statement of Senator Markey:
The era of boundlessly polluting our skies with climate-altering pollution is nearing its end. For decades, weve known that setting limits on smog, on mercury, on other dangerous emissions saves lives and preserves our planet. Today, the Obama administration is proposing to put limits on carbon pollution needed to stop climate changes that are endangering our people and our planet.
These rules are reasonable. They are feasible. And they should soon be expanded to include standards for existing power plants.
For power producers and coal mining companies that reject these standards, they have no reason to complain, and every excuse to innovate. Because when Congress offered a solution to pass a climate and energy bill that would provide billions of dollars to help power companies develop advanced carbon-cutting technologies, they instead chose to hire lobbyists and kill the bill.
Next week, the worlds most comprehensive climate science report is set to be released. We know climate change is an existential threat that is changing our world for the worse. These standards respond to the moral duty we have to address climate change and provide the clear economic incentives for power producers to clean up their act.
http://www.markey.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=345768
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Breaking: Obama administration moving ahead with limits on emissions from power plants [View all]
ProSense
Sep 2013
OP
Can these standards be met by increasing efficiency or do they require carbon capture?
FarCenter
Sep 2013
#16
Utilities will have to use gas or renewable sources because of the cost of sequestration
Kolesar
Sep 2013
#27
"any coal power plants built in the future to emit under 1,100 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour"
FarCenter
Sep 2013
#28
There is also a standard for natural gas (1000 lbs), but that is easily met.
Jesus Malverde
Sep 2013
#30
This will pretty much guarantee the rapid exhaustion of natural gas for home heating
FarCenter
Sep 2013
#31