Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Walmart and birth control... [View all]
.. a few years ago, Mall-Wart agreed that it would fill birth-control scrips without delay. Good.
Today, I posted the "Employer Permission Slip"... 
One guy posted "What's the big deal...? WalMart has birth control pills for $9 a month.
http://walmartstores.com/pressroom/news/6747.aspx
I'm having a hard time coming up with an argument to use on this guy. (Been a long day)
Help me out, please. At this point $9 a month doesn't sound too bad. Especially for something as important as birth control.
Philosophical objections are important, but how about some practical objections?
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rush is using a jackhammer for a vibrator these days...you know, the oxycontin takes it's toll!
blue neen
Mar 2012
#18
I take the pill to control terrible periods. I tried the generics because the copay was lower.
Lisa0825
Mar 2012
#3
is not the 2nd commandment about graven images of god an abomination, like this picture?
part man all 86
Mar 2012
#12
So we should be at the mercy of Walmart pricing? What if tomorrow they decide
myrna minx
Mar 2012
#16
IMO, it's not about the cost as much as it is the fact that your employer can
Arkansas Granny
Mar 2012
#26
They are counting on the fact that it is not that expensive. But for some women, it is.
Mass
Mar 2012
#29
The 9.00 per month claim means that women do not need contraception covered by insurance...
JNinWB
Mar 2012
#31
If it's such a small amount, why is there not full coverage for something so important? n/t
Sheepshank
Mar 2012
#33