General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Not the Onion: "Give Back? Yes, It's Time For The 99% To Give Back To The 1%" [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)At all. It is not. It is up there with nihilism.
What I said is that philosophers recognize it was her baby, as cultish and dangerous as is. Personally I wish the other half of this dangerous combo would be treated the same way, that is Milton Friedman's baby, the Chicago school of economics.
I don't, unlike most of you here, hate her to the point of being blinded to her contributions. Personally I wish she remained a somewhat obscure fiction, short fiction to be specific, used for the only good thing she did well, short fiction pacing.
Alas you have people assign Atlas Shrugged to HS students, and students read objectivism in some college courses. Outside of a history of extreme thought, it should not be assigned, especially to young impressionable young students. When combined with Friedman's economics it is down right dangerous.
But I guess it's best to hate, and be blinded. It befuddles me, but hey, nothing I can do about it. If people think in only black/white dichotomies she is indeed the worst think evah. I prefer to understand, you know why? Modern right wing libertarian thought has embraced both Friedman and her.