Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(110,210 posts)
15. From Consumer reports: Most recent studies have shown a positive energy balance for ethanol
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 08:47 PM
Sep 2013

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/2011/01/the-great-ethanol-debate/index.htm?loginMethod=auto

Snips.

Most recent studies have shown a positive energy balance for ethanol of between 23 and 40 percent.

We put our 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe FFV through our full series of fuel-economy and acceleration tests while running on each fuel. When running on E85 there was no significant change in acceleration. Fuel economy, however, dropped across the board. In highway driving, gas mileage decreased from 21 to 15 mpg; in city driving, it dropped from 9 to 7 mpg. You could expect a similar decrease in gas mileage in any current FFV.

We also took our Tahoe to a state-certified emissions-test facility near our test track in Connecticut and had a standard emissions test performed. We found a significant decrease in smog-forming oxides of nitrogen when using E85. However, ethanol emits acetaldehyde, which the EPA lists as a probable carcinogen and something that standard emissions-testing equipment is not designed to measure. But that might be a relatively minor evil, however.

"Acetaldehyde is bad," says James Cannon, president of Energy Futures, an alternative-transportation publication, "but not nearly as bad as some of the emissions from gasoline."

FULL story at link.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Tell me again why so much of the corn crop goes for ethanol. KamaAina Sep 2013 #1
The use of corn for ethanol was an awful decision. tammywammy Sep 2013 #2
What I don't understand about corn based ethanol is why they don't mysuzuki2 Sep 2013 #6
The stalks are vital for maintaining soil fertility NickB79 Sep 2013 #25
Because of corporate welfare, that's why. n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2013 #9
After the starch is removed the left over corn mash is feed for livestock Omaha Steve Sep 2013 #10
Because the Iowa Caucus AngryAmish Sep 2013 #22
Of course. KamaAina Sep 2013 #23
E10 is hell on power equipment. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #3
My dad loves his boats, and to him ethanol is the devil Lee-Lee Sep 2013 #4
There may be pure gas available somewhere (relatively) near you kenny blankenship Sep 2013 #14
Seems the ethanol mix "dissolves" rubber fuel-conveying patch hoses. Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #20
EPA to require refiners to blend 16.55 billion gallons of renewable fuel FarCenter Sep 2013 #5
Seems that even Al Gore regrets pushing it. oneshooter Sep 2013 #7
How much cheaper is it? JVS Sep 2013 #8
18% today Omaha Steve Sep 2013 #13
Neither of my cars would even start with 84 octane fuel (and the truck is diesel). n/t Egalitarian Thug Sep 2013 #11
92 is the lowest I can put in my car - and I can use ethanol if I want to replace the engine REP Sep 2013 #12
From Consumer reports: Most recent studies have shown a positive energy balance for ethanol Omaha Steve Sep 2013 #15
not sure what 84 octane would do to my car energumen Sep 2013 #16
You can't buy straight 84 octane at the pump Omaha Steve Sep 2013 #18
I use non ethanol gas in my truck NightWatcher Sep 2013 #17
In the owners manual of our focus madokie Sep 2013 #19
Is this another GTA thread? (nt) Recursion Sep 2013 #21
Run that for a year and see if it passes emissions snooper2 Sep 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has anyone else used the ...»Reply #15