General Discussion

zipplewrath

(16,698 posts)

7. You said "need to read"

Tue Sep 24, 2013, 12:22 PM

Sep 2013

You said "need to read". Not "you might have missed" or "gosh, I just noticed, did you?". Mind you, you did nothing more than post a link. No mention of why, no discussion initiated at all by you in a "discussion" forum. And the link was to a poster who has no trouble getting their stuff noticed, up to and including "kicking" their own threads to keep them noticed.

I'm missing the "courteous" part in all of that. The presumptiveness of your own superior knowledge was in plain view however.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Important news on Iran posted yesterday that Dems need to read: [View all] blm Sep 2013 OP

Um, I already knew most of that zipplewrath Sep 2013 #1

The news in the post is a serious development. blm Sep 2013 #3

I did when I heard about them originally zipplewrath Sep 2013 #5

Many people missed it. It's a courtesy to them. blm Sep 2013 #6

You said "need to read" zipplewrath Sep 2013 #7

Geez...acting a bit 'precious' these days, eh? blm Sep 2013 #8

Yes, you did zipplewrath Sep 2013 #11

No, it was NOT. The assumption was that people missed it. blm Sep 2013 #12

Or already knew about it zipplewrath Sep 2013 #14

Now you're just being ridiculous. blm Sep 2013 #17

Christ, the things people here get indignant over. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #9

More like pet peeve zipplewrath Sep 2013 #10

That's YOUR assumption. YOUR assumption is incorrect. blm Sep 2013 #13

Kicking up - blm Sep 2013 #2

Not everyone knew this mcar Sep 2013 #4

I tolerated ten minutes of that BS malaise Sep 2013 #15

Thanks. Scurrilous Sep 2013 #16