Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Popular Science" Online Eliminates Comment Function [View all]OnlinePoker
(6,128 posts)12. Just when we think they've hit rock bottom, they bring out the dynamite. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just when we think they've hit rock bottom, they bring out the dynamite. n/t
OnlinePoker
Sep 2013
#12
I think it's a great idea. Hopefully it is the way of online media in future
Pretzel_Warrior
Sep 2013
#14
More to the point, the rhetoric on science articles actually tangibly, objectively harms science. nt
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#23
Now that you've exemplified the issues in the article, I suggest you read it. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#27
You really need to read the article. Your comment is highly ironic given the substance of the link.
Democracyinkind
Sep 2013
#57
Gosh, you're really in favor of commenting on articles you didn't read, huh?
bettyellen
Sep 2013
#59
The people are not being denied, discouraged or restricted from uninhibited expression
LanternWaste
Sep 2013
#73
Harming the discussion harms the process, especially when it "informs" public attitudes. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#49
I've been reading Scientific American now for around 40 years..haven't found any
shraby
Sep 2013
#24
When they start publishing for the government, they deserve to be dissed.
Eddie Haskell
Sep 2013
#88
Lol, so true! Every time I read either of those I deeply regret it.
Dark n Stormy Knight
Sep 2013
#55
Good for them. We really don't need every article on line open to the incoherent babblings
Dark n Stormy Knight
Sep 2013
#58
A juried moderation system on a site like that would be a nightmare, actually. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#80