Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Why do all Canadians have to learn French when they only speak it in Quebec? ddeclue Jan 2012 #1
Actually, the only offically bilingual province is KamaAina Jan 2012 #5
New Brunswick is great. They also speak English in Nova Scotia, if you can understand the dialects. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #37
No one has to learn French in Canada. Swede Jan 2012 #6
they may not learn it but the gov't makes them go to classes anyways.. ddeclue Jan 2012 #7
No they don't n/t sharp_stick Jan 2012 #11
not so. n/t arthritisR_US Jan 2012 #13
Nope. Swede Jan 2012 #16
Really? OneBlueDotBama Jan 2012 #40
Actrally, we don't all HAVE TO learn French. glarius Jan 2012 #12
for the same reason all Americans have to learn Spanish. provis99 Jan 2012 #28
There is no requirement to know French in most provinces other than Quebec.... riverbendviewgal Jan 2012 #30
My understanding was that you had to learn French unless you spoke it. ddeclue Jan 2012 #44
I met two quite attractive sisters from Edmonton KamaAina Jan 2012 #39
Concerning the 2nd part of your question Frances Jan 2012 #2
As an American, I do not understand this devotion to tradition LonePirate Jan 2012 #3
Fortunately or not, we enable the Parties to come up with their own mechanisms. elleng Jan 2012 #4
The Primaries are a country-wide process blogslut Jan 2012 #8
I can't tell you but I never understood how Botany Jan 2012 #9
Because both politcal parties want it that way... MicaelS Jan 2012 #10
That is not the way that it is supposed to work, but it is, in fact, how it does. potone Jan 2012 #14
I like the "small states first" method JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2012 #15
Why is Canada's Head of State the Queen of England? Nye Bevan Jan 2012 #17
The difference is that the Queen is merely a figurehead. glarius Jan 2012 #18
Wouldn't it be more appropriate for this "figurehead" to be a Canadian? Nye Bevan Jan 2012 #23
This was all decided without bloodshed and it serves us well..... glarius Jan 2012 #26
On reflection, your system does make much more sense. Nye Bevan Jan 2012 #27
the Queen doesn't cost Canada any money. provis99 Jan 2012 #29
Your sarcastic comment does not seem to recognize the fact that we don't sweat over a head of state glarius Jan 2012 #31
It's designed to allow Party insiders and monied interests to select the candidates. Romulox Jan 2012 #19
Our political process is somewhat of an enigma tawadi Jan 2012 #20
South Carolina is representative of reality get the red out Jan 2012 #21
Beats me. Beacool Jan 2012 #22
You are very tolerant of outsiders' opinions...a nice American trait n/t glarius Jan 2012 #24
Thanks!! Beacool Jan 2012 #25
Thanks for asking! FinsUpTechGuy Jan 2012 #32
There's plenty of outrage up here about all those things. polly7 Jan 2012 #33
i know there is some FinsUpTechGuy Jan 2012 #34
I believe people are starting to realize what Harper's intentions are and we will do to his glarius Jan 2012 #35
Think of it this way. Here we have elections, but the majority is never truly represented. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #36
There is an answer to this question cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #38
You do make a good point KamaAina Jan 2012 #41
Simple - two reasons. 1) NH constitution mandates it have the first primary; 2) people are stupid. HopeHoops Jan 2012 #42
We sort of bumbled into it. Jim Lane Jan 2012 #43
Dear glarius, rest in peace dear. AAO Sep 2013 #45
requiescat in pacem, dear glarius. niyad Sep 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Please tell this Canadian...»Reply #45