Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
37. "Uncivil comments" yes they were correct to call them that and
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 08:02 PM
Sep 2013

........"the cynical work of undermining bedrock scientific doctrine is now being done beneath our own stories, within a website devoted to championing science"....
yes they were right to drop out of the ignorant game these knuckedraggers play by shutting the door on comments

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I Sympathize With Them, Ma'am The Magistrate Sep 2013 #1
No bottom? We don't know that, Sir. Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #2
And Keep Going Deeper And Deeper, Without A Bump, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2013 #4
I'll accept it as a working hypothesis. Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #5
Plenty of Room at the Bottom xocet Sep 2013 #28
Just when we think they've hit rock bottom, they bring out the dynamite. n/t OnlinePoker Sep 2013 #12
As we hit what was percived as the bottom Half-Century Man Sep 2013 #51
We do know that. jmowreader Sep 2013 #20
Vandals 1, free Speech 0 pscot Sep 2013 #3
I don't know Xyzse Sep 2013 #6
Like LibertyUniversity.edu? (nt) jeff47 Sep 2013 #9
LOL, Touche Xyzse Sep 2013 #15
I think it's a great idea. Hopefully it is the way of online media in future Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #14
Maybe... Then again, they could go the newspaper route. Xyzse Sep 2013 #17
Our local just dumped Disqus for Facebook IDemo Sep 2013 #19
which mcClatchy rag? reddread Sep 2013 #25
Idaho Statesman IDemo Sep 2013 #29
I'm pretty happy that the Statesman dumped Disqus EvolveOrConvolve Sep 2013 #35
I've seen only two comments so far IDemo Sep 2013 #36
I usually read the LTTE section EvolveOrConvolve Sep 2013 #38
KC Star did the same lastlib Sep 2013 #34
That'd be their letters pages for the most part Posteritatis Sep 2013 #22
The NY Times does that NYC Liberal Sep 2013 #39
"Beam me up, Scotty, there's no intelligent life here..." hunter Sep 2013 #7
this is too bad but i can understand, the internet has made it possible for those JI7 Sep 2013 #8
Very happy to hear this. Wish it happened more often. SleeplessinSoCal Sep 2013 #10
More to the point, the rhetoric on science articles actually tangibly, objectively harms science. nt Posteritatis Sep 2013 #23
not nearly so much as Government restrictions, etc reddread Sep 2013 #26
Now that you've exemplified the issues in the article, I suggest you read it. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #27
I have a better idea reddread Sep 2013 #42
Quod erat demonstradum II: demonstra harder. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #43
Hahhahhahhah!!!!! hatrack Sep 2013 #90
You really need to read the article. Your comment is highly ironic given the substance of the link. Democracyinkind Sep 2013 #57
It really is precisely what PopSci's talking about, isn't it? (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #82
Yup... Democracyinkind Sep 2013 #83
Gosh, you're really in favor of commenting on articles you didn't read, huh? bettyellen Sep 2013 #59
The people are not being denied, discouraged or restricted from uninhibited expression LanternWaste Sep 2013 #73
I disagree SleeplessinSoCal Sep 2013 #47
Harming the discussion harms the process, especially when it "informs" public attitudes. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #49
Good, it's all just theory anyway. Eddie Haskell Sep 2013 #11
what? Popular Science + Scientific American = B.S.? Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #13
I think we have a babble thumper amongst us. nt awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #16
Hardly. Eddie Haskell Sep 2013 #87
You got it! Eddie Haskell Sep 2013 #86
I've been reading Scientific American now for around 40 years..haven't found any shraby Sep 2013 #24
When they start publishing for the government, they deserve to be dissed. Eddie Haskell Sep 2013 #88
please explain that comment, I'll wait, thanks nt steve2470 Sep 2013 #53
There's mountains of evidence supporting theories. Vashta Nerada Sep 2013 #84
K&R n/t NealK Sep 2013 #18
It sucks, but they're right. Posteritatis Sep 2013 #21
You know, Tien1985 Sep 2013 #30
Almost every time I look at any comments section LostOne4Ever Sep 2013 #31
There are people paid to bombard all kinds of sites SoCalDem Sep 2013 #78
I've been reading popular science magazine madokie Sep 2013 #32
Good. secondvariety Sep 2013 #33
"Uncivil comments" yes they were correct to call them that and lunasun Sep 2013 #37
Now HERE'S a great quote; A HERETIC I AM Sep 2013 #40
Wait.....The mom never got an abortion Half-Century Man Sep 2013 #52
Wow, commenter totally missed the point, like most finger waggers. n/t Gormy Cuss Sep 2013 #64
Welcome to the Fascist State of America. zappaman Sep 2013 #41
two things come to mind, those fools Frank Zappa and John Lennon reddread Sep 2013 #45
Stephen King killed John Lennon zappaman Sep 2013 #46
the difference between asking a question and making an assertion reddread Sep 2013 #48
Yes. n/t zappaman Sep 2013 #50
thats funny reddread Sep 2013 #62
73. n/t zappaman Sep 2013 #66
yup thats what i thought reddread Sep 2013 #67
Stephen King the horror writer? Rex Sep 2013 #74
Yes..THAT Stephen King. zappaman Sep 2013 #75
More painful evidence that our culture in the midst of a rapid descent... bvar22 Sep 2013 #44
If only Youtube and Yahoo News would do the same. alp227 Sep 2013 #54
Lol, so true! Every time I read either of those I deeply regret it. Dark n Stormy Knight Sep 2013 #55
Google is trying to force people to use their name on YouTube. joshcryer Sep 2013 #56
It's downright baffling how insistent they are with that. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #60
No shit. 47of74 Sep 2013 #89
Good for them. We really don't need every article on line open to the incoherent babblings Dark n Stormy Knight Sep 2013 #58
The most effective trolls are religion ones. Dash87 Sep 2013 #61
They could learn something about community moderation here. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #63
how should the less intelligent folks be weeded out? reddread Sep 2013 #65
of course, thats the ticket reddread Sep 2013 #68
I think you forgot to change your socks. ret5hd Sep 2013 #77
ha! (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #81
implying? reddread Sep 2013 #85
a) it isn't a matter of intelligence lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #69
Popular Science is to Science reddread Sep 2013 #70
weeding out? reddread Sep 2013 #71
I suggest reading about the DU community moderating system. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #72
true scotsmen? reddread Sep 2013 #76
It is what it is. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #79
A juried moderation system on a site like that would be a nightmare, actually. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #80
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Popular Science&quo...»Reply #37