Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Popular Science" Online Eliminates Comment Function [View all]lunasun
(21,646 posts)37. "Uncivil comments" yes they were correct to call them that and
........"the cynical work of undermining bedrock scientific doctrine is now being done beneath our own stories, within a website devoted to championing science"....
yes they were right to drop out of the ignorant game these knuckedraggers play by shutting the door on comments
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just when we think they've hit rock bottom, they bring out the dynamite. n/t
OnlinePoker
Sep 2013
#12
I think it's a great idea. Hopefully it is the way of online media in future
Pretzel_Warrior
Sep 2013
#14
More to the point, the rhetoric on science articles actually tangibly, objectively harms science. nt
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#23
Now that you've exemplified the issues in the article, I suggest you read it. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#27
You really need to read the article. Your comment is highly ironic given the substance of the link.
Democracyinkind
Sep 2013
#57
Gosh, you're really in favor of commenting on articles you didn't read, huh?
bettyellen
Sep 2013
#59
The people are not being denied, discouraged or restricted from uninhibited expression
LanternWaste
Sep 2013
#73
Harming the discussion harms the process, especially when it "informs" public attitudes. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#49
I've been reading Scientific American now for around 40 years..haven't found any
shraby
Sep 2013
#24
When they start publishing for the government, they deserve to be dissed.
Eddie Haskell
Sep 2013
#88
Lol, so true! Every time I read either of those I deeply regret it.
Dark n Stormy Knight
Sep 2013
#55
Good for them. We really don't need every article on line open to the incoherent babblings
Dark n Stormy Knight
Sep 2013
#58
A juried moderation system on a site like that would be a nightmare, actually. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#80