Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
14. It just annoys me how, during those years, it was mostly ignored.
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 09:28 PM
Sep 2013

It would always be buried in the 4th paragraph of an article, a cursory mention of a candidate or party being banned. Merely having political reading materials could lead to arrest by US forces. This was exactly what initially shook Bradley Manning, by the way. He was working against an outlawed Iraqi group who was merely protesting corruption themselves. When he questioned his superiors about it, he was told to drop it.

I thought that stuff should have been at the forefront of discussion during that sad decade.

Now we have this ridiculous and completely false narrative in the public mind to work with.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OBAMA: "Iraq shows u...»Reply #14