Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
44. He is still denying it.
Wed Sep 25, 2013, 09:40 PM
Sep 2013

Rouhani: I’ve said before that I am not a historian and that when it comes to speaking of the dimensions of the Holocaust, it is the historians that should reflect on it. But in general I can tell you that any crime that happens in history against humanity, including the crime that Nazis committed towards the Jews as well as non-Jews is reprehensible and condemnable. Whatever criminality they committed against the Jews, we condemn, the taking of human life is contemptible, it makes no difference whether that life is Jewish life, Christian or Muslim, for us it is the same, but taking the human life is something our religion rejects but this doesn’t mean that on the other hand you can say Nazis committed crime against a group now therefore, they must usurp the land of another group and occupy it. This too is an act that should be condemned. There should be an even-handed discussion.



This is not Holocaust acknowledgment. It is Holocaust denial. The Holocaust is a specific set of historically verifiable—indeed, historically verified—events. It involved the Nazi murder of somewhere between 5.5 million and 6 million Jews, because they were Jews, as part of an effort whose eventual goal was to exterminate all of Europe’s Jews. Much of it took place in camps organized explicitly to kill people on an industrial scale; at the extreme end, Auschwitz could incinerate almost 5,000 corpses per day. To say that it remains a question for historians is dishonest. To speak of it as continuous with the “crime” the Nazis committed toward non-Jews is disingenuous, and suggests a desire to rob the Holocaust of its central feature, which was its mission, increasingly accepted and then finally codified in January 1942, to kill all of Europe’s Jews.

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114855/iranian-president-rouhani-still-holocaust-denier

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm not sure anyone is rushing. ForgoTheConsequence Sep 2013 #1
Bibi the Baby... WCGreen Sep 2013 #15
Funny ... jessie04 Sep 2013 #2
Too bad your opinion doesn't count for much Scootaloo Sep 2013 #3
The poster can't even do a simple google search on Rouhani and his views on the Holocaust. Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #5
What utter BS - "Iran's Rouhani on Holocaust: 'A massacre that cannot be denied'" Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #4
That was today. jessie04 Sep 2013 #7
Source? Do you have a source for that claim? Or are you just making it up? Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #10
Oh, you're right.. PCIntern Sep 2013 #11
Yes, because not lying about the man means I hero worship him. Excellent argument. Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #12
You actually do... PCIntern Sep 2013 #13
Adorable. Not lying about an accused holocaust denier means I worship holocaust deniers. Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #16
why, how sweet... PCIntern Sep 2013 #17
So, in essence, your entire position is based on the inability to consider... Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #18
Oh please... PCIntern Sep 2013 #20
And I'll just assume you're a neo-conservative shill. Square? Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #21
Ding,ding,ding jessie04 Sep 2013 #25
Oh spare me. I provided documentation against the counterfactual points made. Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #27
If no one cares what the other poster does, explain this subthread please. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2013 #28
That's clearly not what GravityCollapse said. nt LittleBlue Sep 2013 #26
ho-hum jessie04 Sep 2013 #19
Odds are pretty high he's tired of Western reports always trying to peg Iranian leaders... Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #23
He is still denying it. former9thward Sep 2013 #44
The New Republic is a shill for neoconservative sentiment. Not to mention... Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #46
Thanks, it is a good thing that people want peace instead of eternal war. I hope the world responds sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #29
The issue is being anti-Iranian is hopelessly trendy among Americans... Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #31
How do you feel about the US and Israel, and every other nation, doing the same thing? Why should sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #32
When will Israel open up all it's sites to the IAEA. I've heard they KoKo Sep 2013 #36
It's been demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that Israel possesses nuclear weapons... Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #41
"..opens all the nuclear sites to the the IAEA." Like Israel has? Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #37
Free Republic is that way, Jessie. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #38
Another comedic thread! PCIntern Sep 2013 #6
You got guts. jessie04 Sep 2013 #8
Yeah...don't I? PCIntern Sep 2013 #9
You are spot on. 1000words Sep 2013 #14
Pan-Arabism Underground? ForgoTheConsequence Sep 2013 #22
You know how I know you don't know the first thing about the ME? NuclearDem Sep 2013 #30
It's called willful ignorance. ForgoTheConsequence Sep 2013 #34
Don't think Bombing Countries makes them treat their Women KoKo Sep 2013 #39
You will know there is a problem brewing when seveneyes Sep 2013 #40
That would be nice. ForgoTheConsequence Sep 2013 #42
Iran is not an Arab Country, it's not about Iran leader being a hero as much as hope for JI7 Sep 2013 #43
Exactly...balance of power is better than more Iraq, Libya, Yemen.. KoKo Sep 2013 #45
All I remember about Netanyahu is what he had to say after 9/11. That finished him with me. sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #24
The Wiley Cat waiting to see if the Mouse's Strategy gets a little too "Uppity"... KoKo Sep 2013 #33
When Rouhani eliminates the religious leadership, Iran will be well on its way seveneyes Sep 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Israel On Sidelines As Wo...»Reply #44