Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Land Shark

(6,348 posts)
10. Those who pay are Qualified to Control, Those who Receive are not. Voter = Controller
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 12:27 PM
Mar 2012

I'm not defending the logic of the subject line, but there is a long history in the USA of restriction of the right to vote based on whether one had the "necessary" "independence" to have the power of voting, e.g. landowners were thought to have the necessary independence, while wage working renters were not thought to. Based on this very conservative/old idea, it is not even a stretch to say that recipients of any government money are not qualified to be voters. (this would however, fly in the face of numerous US Supreme Court precedents, though the present court might see fit to dispense with those)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RW meta-Talking Point: Th...»Reply #10