Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

whttevrr

(2,347 posts)
12. Numbers from another source:
Mon Sep 30, 2013, 09:55 AM
Sep 2013

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/09/29/questions-and-answers-about-the-shutdown/2888419/
Does anyone have a guess? J. David Cox, president of the American Federation of Government employees, said he expects the number will be 800,000 to 1 million, out of 2.1 million federal employees. That's consistent with a USA TODAY analysis of 2011 shutdown contingency plans, which found that 59% of non-defense government employees would continue to work.


So, 783,000 thousand people seems like a low to moderate estimate.


http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/09/what-happens-if-the-government-shuts-down-who-would-be-affected-and-who-wouldnt/

The last time that happened was in 1996 when the federal government was shuttered for 21 days between Dec. 15, 1995, and Jan. 6, 1996. Before that, a five-day shutdown occurred from Nov. 13 through Nov. 19, 1995. According to the Congressional Research Service, 800,000 federal employees were furloughed during that period.

After the 1996 fiscal year shutdowns, the Office of Budget and Management estimated the cost of the shutdown to be $1.4 billion.


Another 800,000 people estimate.


And Reuters:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/29/us-usa-fiscal-factbox-idUSBRE98S0JX20130929

The last government shutdown ran from December 16, 1995, to January 6, 1996, putting about 800,000 federal workers on furlough.

Here is a roundup of the expected impact of a shutdown.

FEDERAL WORKERS

Up to 1 million U.S. federal workers could face furloughs without pay beginning on Oct 1.


So this is going to hurt almost a million people right away. And as time goes forward the pain will spread out amongst many people who rely on the Government.

Not to mention; this will also cost the Government money on top of that money that is not paid to furloughed workers that gets taken out of our economy and brings hardship to many.

The overseas Malaria medicine thing is incomprehensible...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Napkin math... whttevrr Sep 2013 #1
2.1 billion. lonestarnot Sep 2013 #5
It's napkin math... whttevrr Sep 2013 #9
Thank you for highlighting this yanking of Americans' paychecks, by these members of Congress who Cha Sep 2013 #2
This part sucks... whttevrr Sep 2013 #13
I wonder ,,,, Cryptoad Sep 2013 #3
I dunno but is that a cautionary tale against permanent military cutbacks? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #7
No Cryptoad Sep 2013 #16
So what would make permanent cuts better than a temporary furlough? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #17
It better for the employee, Cryptoad Sep 2013 #18
Double-plus good! Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #19
No need for a personal attack Cryptoad Sep 2013 #20
I was attacking your opinion, not you. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #21
By being Rude and condescending ? Cryptoad Sep 2013 #22
Well, if you must know -- Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #23
What about my answer insulted your intelligence? Cryptoad Sep 2013 #25
The entire premise. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #27
The premise that teabaggers that work around Cryptoad Sep 2013 #28
No, the premise that they'll more readily accept permanent job loss over temporary furlough. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #30
I said nothing of the sorts Cryptoad Sep 2013 #31
You said, quite explicitly Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #32
You missed you mark,,,, Cryptoad Oct 2013 #33
Please expound upon your comment in post #18 Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #37
Nah,,,, Cryptoad Oct 2013 #38
but I'm quoting you verbatim, at length, and asking you to explain Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #39
CNN? Analysis? GeorgeGist Sep 2013 #4
Is there something specific in the numbers that you refute? whttevrr Sep 2013 #8
Another WTF moment polynomial Sep 2013 #6
Um, "new liberal idea" of shutting down the government? truebluegreen Sep 2013 #14
Not to descend into anecdote, but I won't just be furloughed. I'll lose my malaria vaccine Recursion Sep 2013 #10
That's sad... whttevrr Sep 2013 #11
Numbers from another source: whttevrr Sep 2013 #12
The District of Columbia will also be shut down, klyon Sep 2013 #15
The also spit on all of the businesses those people support. gulliver Sep 2013 #24
bunch of fucking assholes. gopiscrap Sep 2013 #26
This is considered a positive for the repukes; it CAG Sep 2013 #29
General Discussion mutian Oct 2013 #34
and it's costing the government more than if they let the government run. STUPID SOB's B Calm Oct 2013 #35
A friend got her furlough notice yesterday spinbaby Oct 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans spit on "...»Reply #12