Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Who do you hope is the first female President? Since Hillary is not available I say Debbie Wasserman [View all]PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)21. Me too. EW definately within the next decade-
is huge on my wishlist.
Up and coming Sandra Fluke, hopefully appointed, or elected to key positions in future years (if of course she is willing) would also be a very great asset, and a potentially wonderful big-time political contender, if she so chooses. Iow, she has 'the right stuff' for high office if she wants to expand upon it.
Love Rachel, and of course would support her, but hat-in-the-ring politics does not appear to be her career bent. Can't read her mind of course, but my guess is that she is currently where she wants to be. Her contributions are already extremely valuable as is.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Who do you hope is the first female President? Since Hillary is not available I say Debbie Wasserman [View all]
applegrove
Mar 2012
OP
she also doesn't help dems running for positions if they run against repub friends of hers
roguevalley
Mar 2012
#62
I thought about this the other day and Michelle Obama crossed my mind
aint_no_life_nowhere
Mar 2012
#4
Barack Obama did not have a whole lot of political experience when he ran (nt)
Nye Bevan
Mar 2012
#40
Why, Mrs. Obama! Class, intellect, ability - my wife and I both think she is just incredible.
NRaleighLiberal
Mar 2012
#10
No. Not enough charisma. She's more of an intellectual type. Not a nat'l political leader. nt
Honeycombe8
Mar 2012
#30
She has more charisma, experience and intellectual chops than many of the other options noted here
Number23
Mar 2012
#33
Elizabeth Warren she's a wonderful fighter for the middle class and would be wonderful in 2016.
ZM90
Mar 2012
#13
I'm in Canada so I don't get the whole 'she has jewish heritage so it would be hard' meme.
applegrove
Mar 2012
#38
Part of it, even from the left, is it indicates she is likely more loyal to Israel.
Behind the Aegis
Mar 2012
#45
She's not a politician. Running for W.H. is only for those who have experience...
Honeycombe8
Mar 2012
#31
She was a toe-curling embarrassment when she was in the running for Hillary's seat.
Nye Bevan
Mar 2012
#43
She, Obama and Clinton certainly have made an almost flawless team where foreign policy is concerned
applegrove
Mar 2012
#57
I like Debbie but I want someone more liberal. For my money E. Warren is where it's at! n/t
TeamsterDem
Mar 2012
#80
This is easy, Warren...if she has the passion she would give even Obama a run of the money
uponit7771
Mar 2012
#82