Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

girl gone mad

(20,634 posts)
66. When Lieberman on the ticket..
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 10:27 PM
Mar 2012

it's a little bit difficult to pretend there was a real difference.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not one of those things detracts from Nader's responsibility to be truthful. n/t LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #1
Electric Monk Mar 2012 #3
Truthful politicians.. Fumesucker Mar 2012 #4
Dude! Rex Mar 2012 #9
Would that make me happy? mac56 Mar 2012 #38
Then what should he do? Rex Mar 2012 #59
For starters, he can acknowledge that he mac56 Mar 2012 #61
Or, the thousands of Democrats who voted for Bush? Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2012 #2
300,000 Democrats in Florida voted for Bush. 10-11 million nationwide. But nope it's Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #11
A lot of people here only work in binary mode. Rex Mar 2012 #60
Nader belongs with that list of other delusional losers Orangepeel Mar 2012 #5
How bout we blame that fucker named Chad???? Devil_Fish Mar 2012 #6
Blame the Corrupt Supreme Court Hawkowl Mar 2012 #7
Indeed. Webster Green Mar 2012 #12
True, but irrelevant Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #34
Wrong dpibel Mar 2012 #35
Correct, and I blame the corrupt SCOTUS most of all. Lasher Mar 2012 #44
Blame Katherine Harris and Jeb Bush's illegal "purging" of 90,000 voters. SharonAnn Mar 2012 #57
Yep libodem Mar 2012 #8
We know he's a loser. If he was really concerned for the U.S., he would have run demosincebirth Mar 2012 #10
+1 mac56 Mar 2012 #37
You're not going to get a real answer. ZombieHorde Mar 2012 #13
Nah, it's more about having a scapegoat.. Fumesucker Mar 2012 #15
Not sure..... NCTraveler Mar 2012 #32
Yes, that is a BIG reason. n/t zappaman Mar 2012 #41
Because none of those people promised to run only in mzmolly Mar 2012 #14
Promises? I can think of 437 politicians in this country whose promises aren't worth the paper cherokeeprogressive Mar 2012 #16
Are we allowed to critique the 437 politicians who didn't keep their promises mzmolly Mar 2012 #18
Indded, I hate them ALL DonCoquixote Mar 2012 #17
Oh for Christ's sake. Zoeisright Mar 2012 #19
Explain to me how Nader... NeoGreen Mar 2012 #28
We Blame Him for INTENTIONALLY Running a SPOILER Campaign AndyTiedye Mar 2012 #20
Nader was running because of his own ego and his personal vindictiveness toward Clinton-Gore RFKHumphreyObama Mar 2012 #23
+1000 ellisonz Mar 2012 #55
wasn’t he heavily funded by republicans left is right Mar 2012 #27
Because of the proportions Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #21
Forget Florida. Old and In the Way Mar 2012 #22
How about blaming Ted Kennedy for electing Ronald Reagan? the other one Mar 2012 #24
Because hardly any Democrats voted for those other candidates piedmont Mar 2012 #25
Umm, because he got 97,488 votes in Florida? pokerfan Mar 2012 #26
I don't hate nader or anyone else NNN0LHI Mar 2012 #29
Seems more than fair to me. Robb Mar 2012 #36
it's a fucking gas... mention nader and all the anti-dem DUers crawl out of the woodwork to defend dionysus Mar 2012 #40
+1 n/t FSogol Mar 2012 #42
!!! Tarheel_Dem Mar 2012 #54
Didn't your Mama ever tell you that 2 wrongs don't make a right? Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #30
Because nader pulled votes from gore, those guys pulled votes from bush mostly scheming daemons Mar 2012 #31
How about Gore's shilling for NAFTA? Does it figure at all? Romulox Mar 2012 #33
the anti dem nader apologists crack me up... dionysus Mar 2012 #39
Because Nader got almost 3 percent of the national popular vote . . . mistertrickster Mar 2012 #43
people get out of whack when some (on here) are called 'Obama haters' WI_DEM Mar 2012 #45
It's his ProSense Mar 2012 #46
What's to hate? AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #47
Actually, I blame Al Gore... brooklynite Mar 2012 #48
Clinton never had to run after lying to the people and being impeached, he left that to Gore. Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #51
Clinton left office with high popularity... brooklynite Mar 2012 #52
Clinton didn't have to campaign, he didn't weather the storm, the War Against Gore started Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #53
...Because it was ALL Nader's fault, bvar22 Mar 2012 #49
Because Browne and Phillips took votes from Bush*, not Gore KamaAina Mar 2012 #50
Hagelin should have used the powers of the mind to remove all hanging chads n/t RZM Mar 2012 #56
Because none of them ran around for three months loudly yelling Arkana Mar 2012 #58
i've seen the pro nader jokers come and go here for 11 years... they will always be with us... dionysus Mar 2012 #64
targeted assassination, indefinite detention, free trade agreements.. frylock Mar 2012 #65
When Lieberman on the ticket.. girl gone mad Mar 2012 #66
LOL, like that was really an "election". It was a "selection". just1voice Mar 2012 #62
Start with Gore. rudycantfail Mar 2012 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For the Nader Haters: a q...»Reply #66