General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Um, this has more to do with 20+ years of Third Way Dems appeasing real crazies, [View all]JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)2010 was mainly about moderate folks in the middle ... and whether those who lean right, or lean left voted.
The attacks on Obama and the Dems (which came from the media) impact the moderate right and the moderate left in different ways.
The moderate right was told that Obama and the Dems were socialist commie terrorist appeasers. Those who moderates who lean right accepted this and it made them angry. And that anger provided a sufficient push for more of them to vote.
Meanwhile ...
The moderate left was told that Obama and the Dems were Corporatist warmongers. Those who lean left heard this message and it frustrated them. Frustration has the effect of draining one's energy. So more of these moderates stayed home.
The media understands how this works, and the GOP is always working every angle at manipulating turnout.
You should notice that while this approach worked in 2010, it failed in 2012. That's because with Obama actually running, his direct message to the moderate middle help re-engage them and reduce the impact of the other "Obama bad" messaging that was targeted to them.
That's how we lose 2010, and yet Obama still gets re-elected in a 2nd landslide.
Liberals voted, and they voted for Obama.
Sadly, and particularly around 2010, some of those liberals who voted for Obama also inadvertently helped amplify messages that had been specifically designed to demotivate the moderate left from voting.
The GOP trying to disenfranchise Democratic voters ... and if they can't do that, they look to the media to help them discourage the moderates on the left and keep them home too. Lower their turn out, and improve GOP chances more broadly.