Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rec 1000words Oct 2013 #1
If you're suggesting we become more psychotic and less intelligent, I'm out. Gravitycollapse Oct 2013 #2
That's what you ARE watching. Bonobo Oct 2013 #3
Then it was inevitable. There is no gain from being dumber and crazier. Gravitycollapse Oct 2013 #4
No, I genuinely believe that harder pushing to the left would result in more gains to the left. Bonobo Oct 2013 #5
You are ABSOLUTELY right, Bonobo. But watch out: they'll call you an Emoprog. Th1onein Oct 2013 #8
It was coined by someone who doesn't like to see unity on our side, Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #13
Well, there is a difference between taking a hard left and acting insane. Gravitycollapse Oct 2013 #22
This is called "soviet style" negotiation.. sendero Oct 2013 #62
It was crazy to ever 'compromise' with lunatic bullies. THAT is why we are sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #53
I take it as rpannier Oct 2013 #32
That's quite a leap. Scuba Oct 2013 #61
Rubbish! nt longship Oct 2013 #6
I think that's a petty straightforward and rational understanding of how it works Douglas Carpenter Oct 2013 #7
You're right. Th1onein Oct 2013 #9
I think it was made up by a troll. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #12
I don't think you are correct. Or, at least, not by that particular troll. Th1onein Oct 2013 #20
Fair enough. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #25
You can do a google search for it on DU. merrily Oct 2013 #34
Nah. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #47
I mean only that it has been used on DU a good while ago. merrily Oct 2013 #56
It's an INSULT. The rightwingers use it to try to shut us up. Th1onein Oct 2013 #80
Obama put a significant marker down on the field with the ACA. He accomplished a very large Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #16
I disagree. I think when they overreach, all they accomplish is looking insane. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #10
One of the major reasons the Left gets very little accomplished. DontTreadOnMe Oct 2013 #11
We need to get the House back in 2014. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #14
The strategy to get the House back includes learning how to "play" the negotiation game. DontTreadOnMe Oct 2013 #15
I think the strategy to get the house back figures out how to shoehorn out at least a few of these Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #17
Here is how the Left needs to play the game... DontTreadOnMe Oct 2013 #18
I hear you. I kind of lean towards the idea that just saying "fuck you" negates the idea that there Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #23
The Progressive Left needs to start making demands DontTreadOnMe Oct 2013 #31
I think part of the problem are the way the rules of the House operate. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #33
Unless the Democrats are in the majority? merrily Oct 2013 #36
The speaker can sign off on any vote. joshcryer Oct 2013 #41
That is not what Warren said. merrily Oct 2013 #43
I should have been clearer and said "The GOP controls...etc. NOW" Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #45
The current speaker is GOP. joshcryer Oct 2013 #50
Yes, I know the current speaker is Republican and am also familiar with the Haester rule. merrily Oct 2013 #52
Who cares what he says. Common vernacular has made him own it. joshcryer Oct 2013 #58
As I said, I consider it irrelevant who they name it after. merrily Oct 2013 #63
He did formulate it. He didn't originate it. joshcryer Oct 2013 #65
If you say that he did not originate it, I am not sure what you mean by "he formulated it." merrily Oct 2013 #68
Formulation is just explaining. joshcryer Oct 2013 #70
Are we going to go back and forth on definitions, too? merrily Oct 2013 #72
I was using it under the second definition. joshcryer Oct 2013 #74
Yes, the party that controls the house controls the committees. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #44
I think you misperceived the point of my post by a lot. merrily Oct 2013 #73
Basically. The majority owns the vote. Discharge petitions never happen. joshcryer Oct 2013 #38
I care if there are blue dogs, but the DCCC hardly even backs a new candidate who is not a merrily Oct 2013 #46
Hey, fair enough, I can get behind that. joshcryer Oct 2013 #54
"The DCCC goes with whoever they think is electable." Meh. merrily Oct 2013 #60
I think that's too simplistic. joshcryer Oct 2013 #64
Warren may be an exception. I am not sure yet. And that is Massachusetts, too. merrily Oct 2013 #66
What about those EMILY's List candidates the DCCC is supporting? joshcryer Oct 2013 #69
You can't equate EMILY's list with "liberal." merrily Oct 2013 #71
Fair enough, I only checked the first three. joshcryer Oct 2013 #75
Exactly how it should be done. DireStrike Oct 2013 #83
ABSOLUTELY. Th1onein Oct 2013 #84
This may not be popular, but we might just need some hardcore liars. joshcryer Oct 2013 #37
You don't need to lie. You just don't have to label people. merrily Oct 2013 #49
That's true, but the intent is still there. joshcryer Oct 2013 #57
I agree. DireStrike Oct 2013 #82
Yep. And we need to fix the filibuster rules. joshcryer Oct 2013 #28
Deadpan humor is so underappreciated these days Fumesucker Oct 2013 #55
Reid doesn't want to get rid of his baby. joshcryer Oct 2013 #59
Deja vu of what was being said when Obama's polls went down during the 08 campaign Turborama Oct 2013 #35
The Republicans don't "seem to grasp." They have BEEN grasped... Orsino Oct 2013 #19
You may be right. LiberalAndProud Oct 2013 #21
True, I have often faulted Democrats for the same Live and Learn Oct 2013 #24
unfortunately I think that is right hfojvt Oct 2013 #26
Boehner: I got 98 percent of what I wanted joshcryer Oct 2013 #27
The new deal didn't happen because people asked for the new deal. redgreenandblue Oct 2013 #29
Agree. Bill Maher had a great New Rules a couple years back where he said this. cui bono Oct 2013 #30
Great for comedy, not good for politics. merrily Oct 2013 #42
Well of course he pushed it to the extreme to make it funny and poke fun at how crazy the other cui bono Oct 2013 #48
Yes. merrily Oct 2013 #51
There is no negotiation on allowing a vote on a clean Continuing Resolution. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2013 #39
Negotiation 101 You don't open with your last, best offer. merrily Oct 2013 #40
So far during this stupid shut down, I'm pretty proud of the democrats. I B Calm Oct 2013 #67
There is no ground so low that they won't take it. ananda Oct 2013 #76
Clever way to win a war, or ... GeorgeGist Oct 2013 #77
The Country IS Moving Left... KharmaTrain Oct 2013 #78
Our side gets it. "Our" elected representatives don't "get it". stillwaiting Oct 2013 #79
This tactic works 99% of the time. DireStrike Oct 2013 #81
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One thing the Republicans...»Reply #28