Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: They couldn't shoot out the tires? Did this have to end with a woman's death infront of a child. [View all]oldhippie
(3,249 posts)146. Just a nit pick, but .....
.. if the child was properly secured in a car seat, I believe it would be in the back seat and facing backwards, so the child probably saw nothing. Probably still scared, though. Hopefully, at that age she won't remember any of it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
211 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They couldn't shoot out the tires? Did this have to end with a woman's death infront of a child. [View all]
diabeticman
Oct 2013
OP
Not to be a jerk, but aren't you dealing in hypotheticals just as much as the OP?
nomorenomore08
Oct 2013
#81
Well, we know that they did not dive on the ground, roll, and then shoot out the tires.
JoePhilly
Oct 2013
#142
She smashed into a police car ... which means she is willing to risk the ives of others.
JoePhilly
Oct 2013
#17
At the point she was at she was not a threat to anyone, bomb or no bomb.
former9thward
Oct 2013
#173
they are not instantaneous, probuably she cleared it as it was rising the cop car did not
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#141
She didn't fire at anyone because she didn't have a weapon in the car. She had
sabrina 1
Oct 2013
#86
They also are duty bound to protect people that go crazy. It is not their fault they go crazy.
Coyotl
Oct 2013
#5
They could have disable the car with there guns. I personally don't feel protected when it seems
diabeticman
Oct 2013
#14
No, they can't, Why do you think they use the spike strips when they can instead of a high-powered
Ikonoklast
Oct 2013
#175
So this was "punishment" and not protecting the public and, frankly, the child?
pipoman
Oct 2013
#47
Started in front of the WH...ended in front of the Capitol...so...um, no.
ScreamingMeemie
Oct 2013
#11
This isn't a televison show where the police/ sheriff / or the good guy shoots out the tires.
Agnosticsherbet
Oct 2013
#19
We haven't had Cable in 4 years! This was secret service, capitol police FBI basically the best
diabeticman
Oct 2013
#64
they probuably did not have stingers to deploy, plus they are difficult to deploy
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#138
Okay, I give. Why is a human head or torso an easier target than a tire?
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2013
#80
Because shooting a trie doesn't stop the deadly weapon the person is driveing
Agnosticsherbet
Oct 2013
#158
putting bullets in tires will not stop a car, especially with puncture resistant tires. nt
geek tragedy
Oct 2013
#24
Exactly, just like people who say you can shoot people in legs or arms...
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2013
#38
your experience is enough to make us wonder whether race wasn't a factor here
Supersedeas
Oct 2013
#126
Shooting her car might have killed several people, inlcuyidng the baby. I see your point,
robinlynne
Oct 2013
#51
Tranquilizing darts are lethal in a lot of cases, and unreliable in others...
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2013
#68
You knew when it was happening that she didn't have a gun? Why didn't you tell the police?
brooklynite
Oct 2013
#55
This is a good read by the DOJ in PDF format on conerns over the use of deadly force
damnedifIknow
Oct 2013
#67
She wasn't shot when they had her surrounded. She should have gotten out and given up
DevonRex
Oct 2013
#74
Act like that in the nation's Capitol, in front of the residence of a man
ScreamingMeemie
Oct 2013
#112
It was an unknown, and if the car was wired to explode what would have been the results if they did
lostincalifornia
Oct 2013
#203
We had a case such as this in our city.... with the same result. I'm sorry she was killed but for
NotThisTime
Oct 2013
#78
I'm as sensitive to the notion, and reality, of excessive force by police as anybody is
nomorenomore08
Oct 2013
#85
You do realize the police had no way of knowing if she had a gun or a bomb in the car, right? n/t
dgibby
Oct 2013
#90
For the police cruiser to be as mangled as it is, the car didn't seem that damaged
LaydeeBug
Oct 2013
#110
The police cruiser was not hit by her car. It hit a barrier after losing control.
ScreamingMeemie
Oct 2013
#113
did they know if she had a bomb in the car and was gonna ram a building of senators? did they know
seabeyond
Oct 2013
#116
ya. what does that have to do with it. she tried going into the white house.
seabeyond
Oct 2013
#130
that is how i see it. as sad as it is. as much as i would like it to be different. nt
seabeyond
Oct 2013
#137
i think that stat is low, to qualify you have to get eighty percent and above
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#153
hell i am an expert shot with all my weapons and i would be lucky with a whole
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#160
problem with shooting tires is that a lot of the time the round bouces off
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#139
yup, from experience tires are not something you want to shoot at with a handgun
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#155
My point was that they clearly did not 'shoot first' the first time they had her surrounded.
randome
Oct 2013
#164
I thought you said below that the cops were making a risky move by shooting her
onenote
Oct 2013
#196
So I'm, wondering... how precisely would you have accomplished the same outcome
LanternWaste
Oct 2013
#147
She had already hit someone with her car and backed into a police car then narrowly missed hitting
appleannie1
Oct 2013
#179