Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Make7

(8,553 posts)
4. He's trying to explain away the idiocy of trying to achieve goals when not in power...
Fri Oct 4, 2013, 03:49 PM
Oct 2013

... that are never achieved (or apparently even attempted) when actually wielding power.

He's romanticizing an idea of smaller government that doesn't, in reality, seem to be what the right ring wants since they don't do anything about it when they are actually in a position to do so. They similarly seem very, very concerned about deficits when Democrats hold the White House, yet when their side holds that office the deficits seem to increase.

I think a lot of people make the mistake of believing the publicly stated goals of many groups are the same as their actual goals. Actions speak louder than words. If they want a smaller government then reduce it's size when you have the ability to do so (or at least attempt it). If deficit spending is worrisome to them, curb spending (or try to) when you hold the purse strings.

It's like many of these Republicans taking to the airwaves to proclaim they don't want to shut the government down - obviously they do want to shut the government down since they could have very easily not done so. To pretend that this shutdown is born of frustration over some lofty goal such as smaller government is disingenuous at best.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»(Crazy conservative) Dout...»Reply #4