Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: They couldn't shoot out the tires? Did this have to end with a woman's death infront of a child. [View all]Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)201. And you have seen this or can link to it?
I have not seen this
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
211 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They couldn't shoot out the tires? Did this have to end with a woman's death infront of a child. [View all]
diabeticman
Oct 2013
OP
Not to be a jerk, but aren't you dealing in hypotheticals just as much as the OP?
nomorenomore08
Oct 2013
#81
Well, we know that they did not dive on the ground, roll, and then shoot out the tires.
JoePhilly
Oct 2013
#142
She smashed into a police car ... which means she is willing to risk the ives of others.
JoePhilly
Oct 2013
#17
At the point she was at she was not a threat to anyone, bomb or no bomb.
former9thward
Oct 2013
#173
they are not instantaneous, probuably she cleared it as it was rising the cop car did not
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#141
She didn't fire at anyone because she didn't have a weapon in the car. She had
sabrina 1
Oct 2013
#86
They also are duty bound to protect people that go crazy. It is not their fault they go crazy.
Coyotl
Oct 2013
#5
They could have disable the car with there guns. I personally don't feel protected when it seems
diabeticman
Oct 2013
#14
No, they can't, Why do you think they use the spike strips when they can instead of a high-powered
Ikonoklast
Oct 2013
#175
So this was "punishment" and not protecting the public and, frankly, the child?
pipoman
Oct 2013
#47
Started in front of the WH...ended in front of the Capitol...so...um, no.
ScreamingMeemie
Oct 2013
#11
This isn't a televison show where the police/ sheriff / or the good guy shoots out the tires.
Agnosticsherbet
Oct 2013
#19
We haven't had Cable in 4 years! This was secret service, capitol police FBI basically the best
diabeticman
Oct 2013
#64
they probuably did not have stingers to deploy, plus they are difficult to deploy
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#138
Okay, I give. Why is a human head or torso an easier target than a tire?
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2013
#80
Because shooting a trie doesn't stop the deadly weapon the person is driveing
Agnosticsherbet
Oct 2013
#158
putting bullets in tires will not stop a car, especially with puncture resistant tires. nt
geek tragedy
Oct 2013
#24
Exactly, just like people who say you can shoot people in legs or arms...
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2013
#38
your experience is enough to make us wonder whether race wasn't a factor here
Supersedeas
Oct 2013
#126
Shooting her car might have killed several people, inlcuyidng the baby. I see your point,
robinlynne
Oct 2013
#51
Tranquilizing darts are lethal in a lot of cases, and unreliable in others...
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2013
#68
You knew when it was happening that she didn't have a gun? Why didn't you tell the police?
brooklynite
Oct 2013
#55
This is a good read by the DOJ in PDF format on conerns over the use of deadly force
damnedifIknow
Oct 2013
#67
She wasn't shot when they had her surrounded. She should have gotten out and given up
DevonRex
Oct 2013
#74
Act like that in the nation's Capitol, in front of the residence of a man
ScreamingMeemie
Oct 2013
#112
It was an unknown, and if the car was wired to explode what would have been the results if they did
lostincalifornia
Oct 2013
#203
We had a case such as this in our city.... with the same result. I'm sorry she was killed but for
NotThisTime
Oct 2013
#78
I'm as sensitive to the notion, and reality, of excessive force by police as anybody is
nomorenomore08
Oct 2013
#85
You do realize the police had no way of knowing if she had a gun or a bomb in the car, right? n/t
dgibby
Oct 2013
#90
For the police cruiser to be as mangled as it is, the car didn't seem that damaged
LaydeeBug
Oct 2013
#110
The police cruiser was not hit by her car. It hit a barrier after losing control.
ScreamingMeemie
Oct 2013
#113
did they know if she had a bomb in the car and was gonna ram a building of senators? did they know
seabeyond
Oct 2013
#116
ya. what does that have to do with it. she tried going into the white house.
seabeyond
Oct 2013
#130
that is how i see it. as sad as it is. as much as i would like it to be different. nt
seabeyond
Oct 2013
#137
i think that stat is low, to qualify you have to get eighty percent and above
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#153
hell i am an expert shot with all my weapons and i would be lucky with a whole
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#160
problem with shooting tires is that a lot of the time the round bouces off
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#139
yup, from experience tires are not something you want to shoot at with a handgun
loli phabay
Oct 2013
#155
My point was that they clearly did not 'shoot first' the first time they had her surrounded.
randome
Oct 2013
#164
I thought you said below that the cops were making a risky move by shooting her
onenote
Oct 2013
#196
So I'm, wondering... how precisely would you have accomplished the same outcome
LanternWaste
Oct 2013
#147
She had already hit someone with her car and backed into a police car then narrowly missed hitting
appleannie1
Oct 2013
#179