Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The individual mandate’s penalty costs more than you think [View all]notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)107. Could you provide a cite and a link for that comment by a Dem?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Anyone making $80,000 yr has employer healthcare or can easily afford to pay the penalty.
JaneyVee
Oct 2013
#86
agreed. this is also another reason to NOT GIVE IN on Republican demands BECAUSE
Pretzel_Warrior
Oct 2013
#14
There are a lot of things that could be fixed. If we are really going to demand the damned law stay
dkf
Oct 2013
#15
what are you talking about? Going forward with implementation does not preclude future changes
Pretzel_Warrior
Oct 2013
#16
That's the argument that is being made against the republicans. The law is passed, they can't
dkf
Oct 2013
#20
they aren't trying to improve it--they are trying to get rid of it. the 1 year delay on individual
Pretzel_Warrior
Oct 2013
#21
I'm just giving the reasons others give me when I wonder why people can't save for retirement.
dkf
Oct 2013
#97
thanks for your judgmental attitude although you know nothing about those who make
liberal_at_heart
Oct 2013
#48
Is that true, Recursion? I'm surprised because you say you and your wife have high end
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2013
#80
Recursion Mon Sep 23, 2013. "I live in India. Mumbai, in fact. I'm here for the Government."
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2013
#92
I have a family of 4 and even with subsidies I will be paying $550/month in premiums.
liberal_at_heart
Oct 2013
#44
As far as the penalty goes, yes. But there is a screw-up regarding the exchanges they should fix
Recursion
Oct 2013
#47
i think it's anything exceeding 10% for individual. not sure about family.
Pretzel_Warrior
Oct 2013
#10
so what else is new? it is hard to navigate pretty much ANYTHING in life if a person isn't
Pretzel_Warrior
Oct 2013
#18
From what I have learned from you guys tonight i have already passed along to friends and relatives.
busterbrown
Oct 2013
#65
No politicians who voted for Obamacare should be allowed to own stock in health insurance cos,
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#31
I think the math is a little off here because they aren't considering the filing threshold.
phleshdef
Oct 2013
#27
If somebody making $80k can't swing an $800 penalty, they are living too large IMHO.
kestrel91316
Oct 2013
#29
My family lives in western WA on $70,000. Most people in this area make $150,000/yr.
liberal_at_heart
Oct 2013
#45
They need to take those "penalties" and make the them PREMIUMS on a Public Option or single payer.
yodermon
Oct 2013
#36
Even with ACA I am going to be paying $6600/yr in premiums plus copays and deductibles.
liberal_at_heart
Oct 2013
#40
Justin Green is also whining that the media didn't hail Ted Cruz for his fake filibuster.
Spitfire of ATJ
Oct 2013
#42
Boo hoo. That's chump change compared to the tax penalty I pay for renting my apartment
Recursion
Oct 2013
#43
$47.50 per child. This will rise to $695 per adult and $347.50 per child in 2016.
Ellipsis
Oct 2013
#58
I vaguely remember my Dad trying to decide between Tricare and Medicare. He
GreenPartyVoter
Oct 2013
#98
oh, ok. Maybe that's what he was talking about. Thanks for the condolences. It's been
GreenPartyVoter
Oct 2013
#104