General Discussion

polichick

(37,626 posts)

24. That's the choice - Rand or HRC? Silly.

Reply to DURHAM D (Reply #9)

Sat Oct 5, 2013, 12:13 PM

Oct 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Nation: Hillary Clinton: It�s Not Her Turn [View all] marmar Oct 2013 OP

If she gets in the race there will be a coronation of her? I should not have read this OP Jefferson23 Oct 2013 #1

But anointing Clinton now isn�t just anti-democratic; it paints a big sign on the party�s door: No djean111 Oct 2013 #2

+100 truebluegreen Oct 2013 #4

The party is moving left, and trending younger. Ikonoklast Oct 2013 #11

I don't get that either. RC Oct 2013 #31

I agree but still, I think she would win handily. nt Mojorabbit Oct 2013 #35

Anecdote, not Data: None of my three children would vote for her, nor their signifcant others. Ikonoklast Oct 2013 #36

I have one too Mojorabbit Oct 2013 #37

There were lots of Republican women who wanted Hillary, PUMA's all were on the Right. Ikonoklast Oct 2013 #38

agreed, that is pretty funny AtomicKitten Oct 2013 #40

I agree davidpdx Oct 2013 #44

Martin O'Malley. Ikonoklast Oct 2013 #48

I agree. It's time to start electing people who are not the first choice of sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #20

You want people to think before they vote? RC Oct 2013 #33

Campaign Finance Reform would change this nation. Ikonoklast Oct 2013 #34

Hear! Hear! Roland99 Oct 2013 #22

there is no annointing arely staircase Oct 2013 #25

Wouldn't it be funny JNelson6563 Oct 2013 #3

This is the time when she and her supporters are testing the waters. djean111 Oct 2013 #6

Oh I still think it'd be hilarious. JNelson6563 Oct 2013 #10

Then it is just as hilarious that there is already a million dollar PAC and Emily's List out djean111 Oct 2013 #13

I'd be pretty relieved too. JNelson6563 Oct 2013 #17

I would breathe a sigh of relief. magical thyme Oct 2013 #7

I would prefer her over Andrew Cuomo who is very likely to run if she doesn't. adirondacker Oct 2013 #47

Yeh, super rich Third Way white folks simply won't make the most appealing Democratic Presidential Zorra Oct 2013 #5

do you have any idea how popular she is among the democratic base (regular primary voters) arely staircase Oct 2013 #26

My whole 20+ extended family will go door to door for Hillary coldmountain Oct 2013 #27

After we elect Wendy Davis governor arely staircase Oct 2013 #28

It's going to be tempting for a lot of Democrats to choose her. LuvNewcastle Oct 2013 #8

''but she doesn't truly stand for anything.'' Whisp Oct 2013 #29

If Hillary doesn't run the next President will be Rand Paul DURHAM D Oct 2013 #9

Rand Paul? Never happen. Ikonoklast Oct 2013 #12

They will vote. DURHAM D Oct 2013 #14

They haven't yet. Ikonoklast Oct 2013 #16

Only if the GOP decides to support same-sex marriage, legal pot, and abortion starroute Oct 2013 #21

Quit trying to scare people with Rand Paul. LuvNewcastle Oct 2013 #15

That's a natural progression (excuse the verb!) from saying "But ROMNEY! PALIN! MCCAIN!" djean111 Oct 2013 #18

So your theory is that people will vote for the most anti-establishment candidate, hughee99 Oct 2013 #23

That's the choice - Rand or HRC? Silly. polichick Oct 2013 #24

Why would Hillary attract millennials, independents, and anti-establishment types? Comrade Grumpy Oct 2013 #32

She won't but DURHAM D Oct 2013 #42

Governor Martin O'Malley. Maryland is at pre-recession employment levels... WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2013 #39

Trumka/Krugman JaneyVee Oct 2013 #19

Clinton Bad; Warren Good LuvLoogie Oct 2013 #30

And unsurprisingly the better candidate isn't proffered. joshcryer Oct 2013 #41

She's still going to run. If not it's Joe's turn. craigmatic Oct 2013 #43

I'm sorry, but I gave up on the Nation liberalhistorian Oct 2013 #45

Yes, as an example... Oilwellian Oct 2013 #46