General Discussion

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

3. It shows

Sat Oct 5, 2013, 01:22 PM

Oct 2013

just how unevenly Medicaid was being applied and the cruelty of rejecting the expansion.

About half of the 17 million Americans eligible for Medicaid will gain coverage in the states that accepted the expansion, but the other half will suffer because Republicans hate the law.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Cruelty of Republican States in One Chart [View all] ProSense Oct 2013 OP

man, do I ever despise that teaparty asswipe guv of Maine cali Oct 2013 #1

They're ALL asswipes, cali. Not just the Maine guy. calimary Oct 2013 #51

Thanks. dgibby Oct 2013 #2

It shows ProSense Oct 2013 #3

K&R One of the good things this will do. n/t Egalitarian Thug Oct 2013 #4

I'm not sure about this chart. Ron Green Oct 2013 #5

Is that after the expansion? ProSense Oct 2013 #11

I agree that the post and chart make it confusing Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #55

The chart reflects 2013 eligbility levels, and ProSense Oct 2013 #56

wordpress.com ? Why not try the official Government website here seveneyes Oct 2013 #39

It makes me want to cry to see how well some states treat their citizens, bunnies Oct 2013 #6

The expansion solved that problem, which evidently upset Republicans. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #13

Evidently. bunnies Oct 2013 #14

two-state solution Doctor_J Oct 2013 #7

There are no "red" states. kentauros Oct 2013 #27

Wisconsin was kinder before the expansion treestar Oct 2013 #8

Before the asshole Scott Walker. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #19

Thanks for this post. mia Oct 2013 #9

You're welcome. ProSense Oct 2013 #12

Top 10 states where eligibility is highest are also on top 10 healthiest states in US. JaneyVee Oct 2013 #10

Arkansas accepted the expansion. ProSense Oct 2013 #20

Again, cruelty is exactly the sweetspot they are aiming for. gulliver Oct 2013 #15

Maybe. After all ProSense Oct 2013 #16

Good post ProSense, thanks. Scuba Oct 2013 #17

You're welcome. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #18

Kick! n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #21

Kick! Looks like Kasich is feeling the heat ProSense Oct 2013 #22

This message was self-deleted by its author DireStrike Oct 2013 #23

You can bet MSMITH33156 Oct 2013 #24

How Obamacare Helped Paul, A Homeless California Man, Finally Get Insurance ProSense Oct 2013 #25

Confused about the chart BumRushDaShow Oct 2013 #26

Corbett dropped his opposition to the expansion, and ProSense Oct 2013 #28

Here is PA's Democratic State Assembly leader's take BumRushDaShow Oct 2013 #49

Thanks. Good to know he's being pressured. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #50

Disgusting, their complete disregard for humanity. Do not tell me the GOP Jefferson23 Oct 2013 #29

Yup! n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #30

I got snookered by that chart a week or two ago Monthly vs. Annually... whttevrr Oct 2013 #31

The real deal whttevrr Oct 2013 #32

You're showing the eligibility effective 2014, and it's still zero for adults ProSense Oct 2013 #36

Your chart is for family of 3, and is wrong. whttevrr Oct 2013 #38

I think you're confusing children's eligibility with parents ProSense Oct 2013 #46

No, it isn't. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #33

Math does not have a political bias... whttevrr Oct 2013 #35

The OP chart is 2013 eligibility. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #37

For a family of three, not an individual adult. whttevrr Oct 2013 #40

It's for 2013. Check out the FPL levels here ProSense Oct 2013 #42

That chart appears to mix yearly/monthly incomes. Here is an accurate PDF from medicaid.gov seveneyes Oct 2013 #34

No, here is the chart ProSense Oct 2013 #41

That does not change the fact that the chart in OP is wrong. whttevrr Oct 2013 #43

No, here is Alabama's eligiblity for a family of three in 2013: ProSense Oct 2013 #44

Here's is a chart with income levels: ProSense Oct 2013 #45

Your chart in the OP uses a family of 3, not individuals (n/t) and done. Go on w/your bad self. whttevrr Oct 2013 #47

The chart at the link in the previous comment is for a family of three. ProSense Oct 2013 #48

OT, but I am astounded that Oregon is so stingy. Laelth Oct 2013 #52

Maybe it had something to do with this: ProSense Oct 2013 #53

Very interesting. Thanks, Pro. n/t Laelth Oct 2013 #54

You're welcome. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #57

$4,500 per month? You were not clear. LukeFL Oct 2013 #58

Here: ProSense Oct 2013 #59

Koch-Backed Group Targets GOP Lawmaker Open To Obamacare Medicaid Expansion ProSense Oct 2013 #60

Pro-Life Groups In Ohio Sue To Block 300,000 Low-Income People From Gaining Health Coverage ProSense Oct 2013 #61

K & R Scurrilous Oct 2013 #62

kick Liberal_in_LA Oct 2013 #63

Thanks. ProSense Oct 2013 #64

Kick! n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #65