Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
13. On Fox News Sunday, a GA R just repeated the STUPID argument
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 09:53 AM
Oct 2013

that "Obama delayed the employer mandate, whiy can't he delay the consumer mandate" for the same period.

Mike Wallace must be rolling over in his grave to hear his son Chris not question that STUPID assertion of equivalence by Tom Graves (R-GA 14th).

Here is a point REALLY "in the weeds" about the delay of the employer mandate: Delay of the employer mandate is partly a result of Republican House obstruction of the "family fix" to the ACA.

The ACA requires employees to get health insurance from their employers (not from the exhanges) unless that employer insurance costs more than 9.5 percent of the employee's earnings. However, a technical mistake was made in the original bill. The 9.5 percent applies only to the premium for the employee him- or herself, NOT the premium for the employee's entire family.

Because of Republican obstruction of the "fix" for this obscure technical mistake, millions of young healthy workers would be kept off the exchanges if their employers started offering insurance now. The delay in the employer mandate.is a partial "fix" for the "family fix" the Rs are obstructing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Absolutely true. truebluegreen Oct 2013 #1
Have you seen the argument in the OP anywhere else? In big media? ProgressiveEconomist Oct 2013 #2
No. But I get my news elsewhere. truebluegreen Oct 2013 #4
"Not concerned"? I'm very concerned that the media are not making spouters ProgressiveEconomist Oct 2013 #6
I'm not concerned that this has gone unnoticed where it counts. truebluegreen Oct 2013 #8
My concern: Rs don't explain "Voter ID", the "Fairness" in Obamacare Boehner just demanded on ABC's ProgressiveEconomist Oct 2013 #17
She's right, although it's hard to hear her message since those other bozos rarely allow her to Arkansas Granny Oct 2013 #3
Republicans since Reagan remind me of Bolsheviks or stormtroopers. "Any means" to ProgressiveEconomist Oct 2013 #7
They want another big brouhaha just before the 2014 elections SoCalDem Oct 2013 #5
Along with gay rights, gun control and abortion, they think this will take them over the top. Arkansas Granny Oct 2013 #9
Already the House has voted 40 times to cancel Obamacare, for no plausible reason ProgressiveEconomist Oct 2013 #10
k&r... spanone Oct 2013 #11
It is all about the 2014 election. Those on Obamacare will tend to vote Obama's party. Coyotl Oct 2013 #12
On Fox News Sunday, a GA R just repeated the STUPID argument ProgressiveEconomist Oct 2013 #13
I don't know if I buy that Travis_0004 Oct 2013 #14
Don't forget there are significant ACA "carrots" as well as minor "sticks" ProgressiveEconomist Oct 2013 #19
Obama played right into their hands joeglow3 Oct 2013 #15
You buy Boehner's phony "fairness" talking point, which dominated his Stephanopoulos ProgressiveEconomist Oct 2013 #18
Never said I believed it joeglow3 Oct 2013 #21
Your post has inspired me to start a new thread, at URL ProgressiveEconomist Oct 2013 #20
Yes. They don't want any success. WCLinolVir Oct 2013 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why do Republicans want a...»Reply #13