Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

A HERETIC I AM

(24,876 posts)
7. Read the OP again.
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 03:58 PM
Oct 2013
The scrip would not violate the debt ceiling because it wouldn’t constitute a new borrowing of money backed by the credit of the United States. It would merely be a formal acknowledgment of a pre-existing monetary claim against the United States that the Treasury was not currently able to pay. -

- To avoid any confusion with actual Treasury debt, and to be consistent with the law governing claims against the United States more generally, the scrip would not pay interest in most cases. And unlike debt, it would have no fixed maturity date but rather would become redeemable in cash only when the secretary of the Treasury was able to certify that there’s enough money available in the Treasury’s general fund to cover it.


They way the article is written, there would be a possibility for some gain on the part of the buyer because they would be "allowing financial institutions to buy it at a high percentage of its face value" meaning at a discount to par.

Not bonds that go through the normal auction process.

More like Federal IOU's.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yard Sale! Roland99 Oct 2013 #1
Wouldn't that still devalue the current debt because it caps the interest? landolfi Oct 2013 #2
Callable, face value, zero coupon bearer bonds. A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #3
But, it changes the original contract to less favorable terms, and thus devalues it landolfi Oct 2013 #5
Read the OP again. A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #7
I did read it, still default IMNSHO landolfi Oct 2013 #14
The effect of this would likely be similar to an actual default. PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #4
It would send the message that the United States is a credit risk BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #6
That message is already out there and it WON'T make Wall Street "happy". A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #9
Wall Street *will* be happy to get their money AND to put this president on the path to impeachment. BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #13
There's also the use of bonds that pay an interest, but never promise to repay any of the principal BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #8
THAT makes perfect sense, Benton D Struckcheon Oct 2013 #10
Why would an investor want to buy that? DCBob Oct 2013 #11
An investor would convert a sum he had now into a perpetual stream BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #12
No it wouldn't.... A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #16
I can follow why the interest could be lower. But these consols aren't callable BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #17
Any security of this type can have a call provision at the outset. n/t A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #18
OK, but then the consol would count against the debt limit, so such a provision would then BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #19
LOL...I think we're getting above my pay grade! A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #20
Well, I didn't find any contemporary examples of consols, but BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #21
Re: your last sentence: Exactly. A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #22
What would stop a future president from issuing scrip to fund things congressrefuses to fund Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Best solution I have seen...»Reply #7