Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
74. US shutdown a smokescreen for assault on Social Security, Medicare
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 03:50 PM
Oct 2013

Barry Grey
World Socialist Web Site, 3 October 2013

In an interview on day two of the partial shutdown of the US government, broadcast by the pro-business cable TV channel CNBC, President Barack Obama offered talks on cutting basic social programs such as Medicare and Social Security in return for Republican support for funding federal operations and raising the national debt ceiling.

Obama continued to reject any negotiations with House Republicans on a so-called “continuing resolution” to reopen the government that is tied to a delay in implementation of his health care overhaul. At the same time, he linked a “clean” funding bill to passage of legislation to raise the national debt ceiling before the current limit expires and the country goes into default, estimated by the Treasury Department for October 17.

Obama’s remarks added to mounting evidence that behind the appearance of partisan warfare in Washington, the two big business parties are planning to use a crisis produced by an extended government shutdown as a smokescreen for reaching a deal to impose historic attacks on the bedrock social programs left over from the New Deal and Great Society periods.
In the interview, Obama said he agreed on the need to continue eliminating “unnecessary” social programs and was ready to discuss cuts in “long-term entitlement spending.” He also said he would accept Republican demands that there be no increase in personal income tax rates.

SNIP...

In the previous manufactured crises of 2010, 2011 and 2012, Obama had offered to support cuts in cost-of-living raises for Social Security recipients and structural changes in Medicare, such as increasing the eligibility age and introducing means testing, along with sharp cuts in corporate taxes, as part of a broad bipartisan deficit deal.

However, no such deal on entitlement programs was reached. Instead, more than $2 trillion in cuts in domestic nondefense discretionary spending were mandated, bringing this category of social spending in the US—for education, housing, infrastructure, health and safety, the environment, culture—to its lowest level as a percentage of the gross domestic product since the 1950s.

CONTINUED...

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/03/shut-o03.html



Yet the MIC and wars for profit prove themselves exempt.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kabuki jberryhill Oct 2013 #1
Thanks leveymg Oct 2013 #34
*snort* jberryhill Oct 2013 #56
taking down the scenery now. nt grasswire Oct 2013 #2
Died in New Haven or headed to Broadway? leveymg Oct 2013 #35
People forget that Obama is fighting Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #3
No, ProSense Oct 2013 #7
Can you distill that down to a few lines of confusion and obfuscation? leveymg Oct 2013 #8
Sure, ProSense Oct 2013 #9
What is your response to the points made in the OP, anyway? leveymg Oct 2013 #10
I don't know ProSense Oct 2013 #17
I really don't think this whole thing has been about Obamacare. leveymg Oct 2013 #19
In terms of points on the board, I'm not sure we're really ahead. leveymg Oct 2013 #37
Something like 97% of the EPA is furloughed riderinthestorm Oct 2013 #52
But of course that's at sequestration levels of funding... exactly. So, who wins? Austerians in leveymg Oct 2013 #55
Obama is an Austerian, is he not? So win, win for him? SammyWinstonJack Oct 2013 #70
He's not a full-blown deficit hawk, obviously, but he's the one who continues to bring up leveymg Oct 2013 #72
Here is the picture: Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #14
Again, those are numbers. The CR is different from the Senate budget ProSense Oct 2013 #15
Yes, those are the Senate budget numbers. progressoid Oct 2013 #18
Yes, ProSense Oct 2013 #20
Seems the Austerians won. leveymg Oct 2013 #38
The CR the senate is demanding is for $986 billion Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #22
Read the information at your link. ProSense Oct 2013 #24
You seem to skip right over that point. The CR budget is lower than the Sequester. How did we win? leveymg Oct 2013 #39
Good point. How does the original Obama budget differ from the CR? leveymg Oct 2013 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author woo me with science Oct 2013 #31
Game, set, and match to corporate looters in *both* parties. woo me with science Oct 2013 #32
PPP--"GOP could lose the House in 2014" ProSense Oct 2013 #36
General disgust and revulsion at Budget Austerity by Default seems pretty much bipartisan. leveymg Oct 2013 #40
Republicans' actions prove they're terrorists. They should lose big. Agree? n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #44
Those who are convinced of that are already convinced of that. Where's the net gain? leveymg Oct 2013 #51
As for ProSense Oct 2013 #41
If you say so Shivering Jemmy Oct 2013 #4
You may be right. Laelth Oct 2013 #5
Sometimes, I really hate being right about things like this. leveymg Oct 2013 #42
Been there. Still doing that. Laelth Oct 2013 #54
The libertarian dream n2doc Oct 2013 #6
Exactly. A military-industrial police state with liberal credentials. Almost a perfect blend of leveymg Oct 2013 #11
Something BIG is in the works. I question how much Obama knows and or is in control. Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #12
I see no holes in that theory. Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #26
Thanks... Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #28
Are you sure you're not just pulling cards out of the deck randomly? leveymg Oct 2013 #43
Yep... Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #59
I don't think the last Prez needed any bamboozling. leveymg Oct 2013 #60
The Cheney/Bush administration was the closest we ever got to direct rule by the Deep State. Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #61
To the contrary, I think they (whoever that may be) are getting pretty much everything they want leveymg Oct 2013 #62
Domestically, yes. Foreign policy wise, no. Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #63
Read it more carefully. Barack_America Oct 2013 #13
Well, good. progressoid Oct 2013 #21
Yep. I fear this is correct. cui bono Oct 2013 #23
Tea Party Line Item Veto by Default - that captures it pretty well. leveymg Oct 2013 #45
That is some pretty shitty analysis of this announcement Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #25
Wanna explain what you mean by that? leveymg Oct 2013 #49
I disagree. nt Mojorabbit Oct 2013 #76
I think the repukes get their azz handed to them flamingdem Oct 2013 #27
How will that happen? leveymg Oct 2013 #50
nah, nebenaube Oct 2013 #53
K&R woo me with science Oct 2013 #29
Thanks leveymg Oct 2013 #47
kick woo me with science Oct 2013 #30
Thnx leveymg Oct 2013 #48
kick woo me with science Oct 2013 #33
Thanks! leveymg Oct 2013 #46
kick nt grasswire Oct 2013 #57
I don't think you are supposed to notice that. n/t Egalitarian Thug Oct 2013 #58
LOL!!! That is the funniest post I have ever read on DU. Are you SURE this is DevonRex Oct 2013 #64
Glad you got the humor in this. leveymg Oct 2013 #65
Why delay an operation because of the lazy Republicans? DevonRex Oct 2013 #66
Not sure it all went off like clockwork, particularly in Somalia leveymg Oct 2013 #67
There'll always be something DevonRex Oct 2013 #68
I hope this doesn't go on through 10/17. Some may experience serious problems if it does. leveymg Oct 2013 #69
Every 2 weeks. DevonRex Oct 2013 #71
Then, this is going to hurt a lot of people. leveymg Oct 2013 #73
US shutdown a smokescreen for assault on Social Security, Medicare Octafish Oct 2013 #74
That was an incredibly depressing article, CrispyQ Oct 2013 #75
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Selective Shutdown Over f...»Reply #74