Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not a big fan of the Sedition Act Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #1
It's a dangerous sword, but the words would give them pause...after all...we need our own demands nt LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #3
I was against the Sedition Act Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #13
Its not "convenient" and it isn't to punish constitutionally protected behavior LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #16
what non-constitutionally protected behavior has been engaged in by the repubs? onenote Oct 2013 #25
One man's principled stand is another man's sedition Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #33
Agreed North Carolina Knigh Oct 2013 #34
Welcome to DU! Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #35
Pretty sure it doesn't onenote Oct 2013 #2
Pretty sure it does, but you LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #4
I take it the "*" around concern is of significance? el_bryanto Oct 2013 #11
You set up your *VERY* *OWN* straw man, how quaint. LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #18
Yes, let's set a legal precedent for the Republicans to use the next time they are in power! Lurks Often Oct 2013 #5
Oh, well we should just capitulate and give them what they want, why wait 10-20 years? LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #7
And maybe you should consider the long term consequences of your ideas n/t Lurks Often Oct 2013 #12
Maybe they should. n/t LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #19
You'd need to point out an act of sedition first. nt Dreamer Tatum Oct 2013 #6
Ok... LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #9
Thanks for the definition. The law requires more than a cut and paste, however. nt Dreamer Tatum Oct 2013 #10
You're welcome, and their ACTIONS provide for the definition, not the other way around.nt LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #20
The treason/sedition/terrorism talk is really starting to jump the shark. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #8
So you want to fire on Ft Sumpter to prove a point, huh? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #14
a *fire*? On Fort Sumpter? LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #21
If you criminalize opposition then, yes, you will be instigating the 2nd American Civil War. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #30
This is not how the process is designed. This morningfog Oct 2013 #40
Nonsense. No member of congress can penalized for not voting for something. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #41
Who are they? nt. NCTraveler Oct 2013 #15
teabaggers. nt LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #22
Considering your op goes against what this country should stand for... NCTraveler Oct 2013 #24
This OP is either brilliant satire (in which case, egg on my face) NuclearDem Oct 2013 #27
I am trying to give them the benefit of the doubt. NCTraveler Oct 2013 #28
Article 1, Section 6, US Constitution tkmorris Oct 2013 #17
that allows exception LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #23
Which exception do you think applies? onenote Oct 2013 #26
bad road to go down--remember the wisconsin 16 who fled madison to avoid dembotoz Oct 2013 #29
No one should be held indefinitely w/o trial fitman Oct 2013 #31
The Patriot Act disagrees with you. nt LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #37
If all the people who could be guilty of sedition were thrown in jail... The2ndWheel Oct 2013 #32
Well why have laws if we aren't going to use them? LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #38
Advocate for their use against every seditious act done by anyone, at any time then The2ndWheel Oct 2013 #39
And sent to reeducation camp! Throd Oct 2013 #36
ROFL MAO Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They should be arrested f...»Reply #36