Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Which of these names would be *NOT* be racist for a team to call themselves? [View all]
| 2 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
| The Washington Redskins | |
0 (0%) |
|
| The Washington Whiteskins | |
0 (0%) |
|
| The Washington Blackskins | |
0 (0%) |
|
| The Washington Brownskins | |
0 (0%) |
|
| The Washington Yellowskins | |
0 (0%) |
|
| All would be racist or racially insensitive and insulting. | |
2 (100%) |
|
| None of the above are racist or racially insulting. | |
0 (0%) |
|
| 0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
| Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
|
25 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Which of these names would be *NOT* be racist for a team to call themselves? [View all]
CreekDog
Oct 2013
OP
Honestly, I could go with Pigheads or Washington Chitlins....pigskins seems presumptuous
HereSince1628
Oct 2013
#25
Poll: 90% of Native Americans aren't offended, 79% of Americans don't want it changed
LittleBlue
Oct 2013
#13
That comports with my anecdotal experience. I have known lots of Native Americans.
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2013
#15