General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "60 Minutes" piece on SSDI slammed by disability advocates... [View all]anneboleyn
(5,626 posts)And you think this represented unbiased reporting on the part of Sixty Minutes? Allowing an anti-disability republican politician to drive the discussion while focusing on ONE attorney with sketchy practices? You really don't realize how outrageously biased that sort of "reporting" (rather, myth-making) is? While real people, people with devastating diseases and illnesses (many terminal), are affected by this garbage "reporting? Why were NO disabled persons interviewed or a range of disabled persons, and their doctors and/or representatives, to discuss their experiences?? The report was offensively one-sided, right in step with Fox News and Joh Stossel, who argue that ALL welfare and ALL disability is fraud, "those people" are all freeloaders, surfers (remember him?), drug addicts, and women with ten SUVs who should be drug tested (remember how this story died when welfare recipients were forcibly drug tested in Florida and the program cost a fortune while accomplishing nothing).
The reality is heartbreaking. People who are seriously ill, many with terminal diseases and/or permanently disabling conditions, often earned on the job, have to wait an average of two years before being approved for a MINIMUM WAGE income, and then after another two years (during which many people die), they can get Medicare.
Do you think these "googled" stories you have found and a tale of some guy on a "reality show" accurately represents the majority of people who receive SSD -- who can never work again and must have all of their doctors report on their condition (plus verify imaging reports, lists of medications, etc.)? If so I am shocked that you are interested in being a member of DU. The Welfare Queen and Disability King mythology is a republican, not a democratic argument.