General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This needs to be said: Not hiring someone because they have tattoos is anti-progressive. [View all]earthside
(6,960 posts)That is your opinion -- not some universal definition of 'progressive' or 'anti-progressive'.
Besides, smoking pot on the job is grounds for dismissal whether you are progressive or not.
You can do your pot smoking in private on your own time. (Maybe exceptions for medical marijuana.)
But public tattoos are public -- employers should have the freedom to decide what is appropriate for display in their own business.
For instance, I would totally support a restaurant manager/owner at a family or expensive place not hiring someone with snakes or skulls or guns tattooed on their neck or on their hands.
At a biker bar or someplace like that, of course, that is up to the owner.
I don't think being progressive or not has anything to do with an employer wanting what is appropriate for their business.