Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
39. There simply is no Democratic equivalent of Rush Limbaugh spewing hate all day.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 05:56 PM
Oct 2013

There is no Democratic equivalent of a number of these hate-spewers.

Listen to Pacifica Radio's news programs. That is the far left. There is a calmness, a dispassion in most of the programming there that I listen to. They convey information. Listen to Thom Hartmann. Very calm and also conducting genuinely thoughtful dialogues with people who disagree with him. Then watch Fox News, Bill O'Reilly. Watch the contempt that Fox News shows for people who disagree with Fox. Watch the hate coming out of the pores of some of the Fox News types.

It's that hate that makes right-wingers so extreme. It is very, very sad for our country.

The hate is there because the right-wing philosophy cannot stand up to reason. In 2008, we saw what happens when the markets are allowed to run "free" without regulation. People cheat. That's what happens. And that's how a lot of America's 19th century moguls, often the great-grandparents of Americans who are out pillaging, ravaging the earth today, made their money. By squeezing out all competition, by cheating. They called it competition, but it wasn't. It was monopolizing the market, say getting a legislature to pass favorable laws so that your products could get to market but your competitors' couldn't. It was that over and over.

Meanwhile, it was the generous land grants to railroads that really built the West and made us a nation -- -government largesse to specific individuals. The truth about American history is not generally know, and when it is learned, you can see the lies the extreme right-wing and libertarian branches of the Republican Party.

We need to work together. Should we have free enterprise. Yes. But we need rules that give new businesses, truly small businesses, mom-and-pop businesses a fair chance. Rules that insure that if you buy a stock, the company that issued it can't in a back-handed way cheat you out of your money. Rules that insure that if you work for a company and are supposed to get a pension from that company, the company can't merge with another company or sell to another company and allow the new company to take your promised pension. Rules that put pressure on companies not to drive competitors out of specific markets by selling products way under cost. Rules that insure that American working people can compete in international markets in spite of our very valuable currency.

Many Republicans have no idea why we have environmental regulations. They simply don't study that field. They don't really understand chemistry. They don't know what it means if someone dumps arsenic into the water supply of a town. They have never heard of the sheepherders in Scotland who used arsenic when they sheared and washed their sheep. They don't know what they are talking about. They just think that if you simply spew your poison on the earth, God will somehow take care of it. Doesn't work that way. They don't know how much care is put into monitoring the safety of the water that comes out of their tap or their well. They don't understand the role of the EPA and government in making sure they can breathe safely and drink water safely.

Too many Republicans spew hate rather than information. It's a doggone shame because it is really hurting our country. The numbers of right-wing militia groups in the country speaks for itself. Go to the Southern Poverty Law website and find out for yourself.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You might want to take a break for a while Abq_Sarah Oct 2013 #1
+1 NoOneMan Oct 2013 #2
Wait for this: blkmusclmachine Oct 2013 #3
There is no equivalent violence from the left in America. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #4
Late 70s and early 80s were the last of that from the left in the US AFAIK Recursion Oct 2013 #6
Jonestown was not in the United States. eShirl Oct 2013 #17
Well, "from the US" Recursion Oct 2013 #20
You forgot to take back the 'left' part. blm Oct 2013 #43
Because they were an anti white supremacy socialist cult Recursion Oct 2013 #50
Jonestown wasn't leftist - it was a religious CULT ala GOP Moonie cults. blm Oct 2013 #28
Yes, it was left. post-racial socialist utopia stuff (nt) Recursion Oct 2013 #48
Jonestown was not left at all. To the contrary. And MOVE, I don't know about because I JDPriestly Oct 2013 #31
Read up on Jonestown. You'll be surprised (nt) Recursion Oct 2013 #49
It was the "People's Church." Common Sense Party Oct 2013 #52
That is not where Jim Jones came from. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #53
How about that guy that shot up the FRC? Or the guy that took hostages at the Discovery network over Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #9
er, all those I mentioned DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #24
Stop humiliating DU, drop the sedition talk LittleBlue Oct 2013 #5
Not members of the legislature, at least that is not my view. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #7
Loughner was a whackadoodle. The Martin killing was not political. The OP is plain ol' wrong. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #10
Loughner was a whackadoodle who tried to kill a Democrat and killed many of those JDPriestly Oct 2013 #32
Loughner was obsessed with 9/11 truthiness and a film called Zeitgeist. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #34
Well, there you go again. blueridge3210 Oct 2013 #37
Thanks for bringing Ann C. up DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #56
There simply is no Democratic equivalent of Rush Limbaugh spewing hate all day. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #39
Loughner didn't listen to RW radio. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #40
Ok, you get it DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #25
Yes. We don't have to send people to jail. We just have to point out that they are using violent JDPriestly Oct 2013 #30
And somewhat frightening given political history in multiple states Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #13
No - but the senate should hold hearings based on the appearance of corruption. blm Oct 2013 #44
Here's what you need to do in several easy steps... Decaffeinated Oct 2013 #8
Perhaps you could practice what you preach? Oh, and then grab a dictionary LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #29
I'm good thanks... Decaffeinated Oct 2013 #45
Whatever gets you through the day LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #46
Although it won't be used I agree with the sedition argument because.. Bearheim Oct 2013 #11
So if father refuses to buy his daughter concert tickets he kidnapped her Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #19
this is your justification for charges of sedition? really? DrDan Oct 2013 #12
I agree with you and I find the people who get on their high horse and put you down, (and me and Maraya1969 Oct 2013 #14
All of these arguments remind me of Christian "scientists"... Decaffeinated Oct 2013 #15
If people threaten to use Violence DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #26
And last I remember, Mrs Second Amendment remedies lost badly NuclearDem Oct 2013 #41
Chose your battles TexasProgresive Oct 2013 #16
You seem to be equivocating around what "this" refers to. Warren Stupidity Oct 2013 #18
To those who say, "This is the dumbest post I've ever seen" Jeff In Milwaukee Oct 2013 #21
Yeah, it's stupid. Dr. Strange Oct 2013 #51
Excellent points. Are you a constitutional law professor? (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #22
Is somebody on DU saying that? LWolf Oct 2013 #23
There are at least a dozen threads everyday making that claim. former9thward Oct 2013 #38
I can't say that I've missed much. LWolf Oct 2013 #47
weak. nt aikoaiko Oct 2013 #27
OK, who wants to argue this before a judge? dairydog91 Oct 2013 #33
Beyond stupid n/t RZM Oct 2013 #35
Preposterous n/t cthulu2016 Oct 2013 #36
None of which has even the slightest to due with the rules of the House NuclearDem Oct 2013 #42
the problem is DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #55
You forgot Michael Hastings Throd Oct 2013 #54
wow. impressively clueless. utterly, shockingly clueless. cali Oct 2013 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»tothe people who say &quo...»Reply #39