Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

2ndAmForComputers

(3,527 posts)

22. They'll try to reverse Roe vs. Wade, the little, pathetic, despicable anti-woman bigots.

Reply to Kurmudgeon (Reply #15)

Sun Mar 4, 2012, 02:18 AM

Mar 2012

That seems to be every extremist right-winger's hard-on nowadays - women's rights.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You know... How the fuck have we gotten into a debate on birth control? [View all] Ohio Joe Mar 2012 OP

I admit that Rachel's "they have a conscious plan to move everyone right" jsmirman Mar 2012 #1

cuz repubs want to control the agenda to avoid their failed economic policies? nt msongs Mar 2012 #2

bingo!!! newspeak Mar 2012 #30

Because birth control debate creates jobs!!! n/t seeviewonder Mar 2012 #3

The old standards NightOwwl Mar 2012 #4

For the past 2 years Teabaggie pols have been chipping away at women's health rights.... Walk away Mar 2012 #5

At least 20 years ago I (and other older feminists) started warning young women Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #13

you and I, and many, many others, have been warning about this for many years. niyad Mar 2012 #17

I agree but the Blunt bill had nothing to do with birth control pills except... Walk away Mar 2012 #19

This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Mar 2012 #25

I was just making a point about the teabaggers and their war on women. They didn't exist... Walk away Mar 2012 #28

it's hard to believe. america has a broken system of government. plain & simple. spanone Mar 2012 #6

I think it's a Catholic thing more than a Republican thing. virgogal Mar 2012 #7

sorry, but if you have been watching the christian reichwing fundies, they have been after niyad Mar 2012 #18

I don't think they removed the "chattle" clause from their lexicon... Historic NY Mar 2012 #8

Yup. Like asking if we really did go to the moon. BC has improved lives. MichiganVote Mar 2012 #9

No one ever accused the Repubs of being bright. Jennicut Mar 2012 #10

I still think whoever is the GOP nominee this year, is just a book marker. Kurmudgeon Mar 2012 #15

They'll try to reverse Roe vs. Wade, the little, pathetic, despicable anti-woman bigots. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #22

I listen to BBC World Service pokerfan Mar 2012 #11

No, it's not a Catholic thing. PDJane Mar 2012 #12

Did you read Susan Faludi's 'Backlash'... Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #14

Yes. PDJane Mar 2012 #34

From the Republican viewpoint, it's a perfect trifecta! Fozzledick Mar 2012 #16

Because Griswold v. Connecticut is unacceptable settled law. Loudly Mar 2012 #20

I have been asking myself the exact same question. emmadoggy Mar 2012 #21

This seems like a no-lose for Obama. JDPriestly Mar 2012 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Mar 2012 #24

Because the spin doctors on our side asked themselves... Sen. Walter Sobchak Mar 2012 #26

Mostly, they hate that President Obama supports it. GoCubsGo Mar 2012 #27

The Right claims we started it Generic Other Mar 2012 #29

I still want to know what republican women really think IcyPeas Mar 2012 #31

The Republicans have miscalculated badly on this particular topic Lex Mar 2012 #32

They needed to create a distraction from the economy/jobs, as they have no ideas n/t OhioChick Mar 2012 #33