General Discussion

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)

45. I'm good thanks...

Reply to LaydeeBug (Reply #29)

Tue Oct 8, 2013, 08:32 PM

Oct 2013

I've still retained my ability to make logical statements AND to define words.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

tothe people who say "this cannot be sedition because [View all] DonCoquixote Oct 2013 OP

You might want to take a break for a while Abq_Sarah Oct 2013 #1

+1 NoOneMan Oct 2013 #2

Wait for this: blkmusclmachine Oct 2013 #3

There is no equivalent violence from the left in America. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #4

Late 70s and early 80s were the last of that from the left in the US AFAIK Recursion Oct 2013 #6

Jonestown was not in the United States. eShirl Oct 2013 #17

Well, "from the US" Recursion Oct 2013 #20

You forgot to take back the 'left' part. blm Oct 2013 #43

Because they were an anti white supremacy socialist cult Recursion Oct 2013 #50

Jonestown wasn't leftist - it was a religious CULT ala GOP Moonie cults. blm Oct 2013 #28

Yes, it was left. post-racial socialist utopia stuff (nt) Recursion Oct 2013 #48

Jonestown was not left at all. To the contrary. And MOVE, I don't know about because I JDPriestly Oct 2013 #31

Read up on Jonestown. You'll be surprised (nt) Recursion Oct 2013 #49

It was the "People's Church." Common Sense Party Oct 2013 #52

That is not where Jim Jones came from. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #53

How about that guy that shot up the FRC? Or the guy that took hostages at the Discovery network over Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #9

er, all those I mentioned DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #24

Stop humiliating DU, drop the sedition talk LittleBlue Oct 2013 #5

Not members of the legislature, at least that is not my view. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #7

Loughner was a whackadoodle. The Martin killing was not political. The OP is plain ol' wrong. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #10

Loughner was a whackadoodle who tried to kill a Democrat and killed many of those JDPriestly Oct 2013 #32

Loughner was obsessed with 9/11 truthiness and a film called Zeitgeist. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #34

Well, there you go again. blueridge3210 Oct 2013 #37

Thanks for bringing Ann C. up DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #56

There simply is no Democratic equivalent of Rush Limbaugh spewing hate all day. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #39

Loughner didn't listen to RW radio. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #40

Ok, you get it DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #25

Yes. We don't have to send people to jail. We just have to point out that they are using violent JDPriestly Oct 2013 #30

And somewhat frightening given political history in multiple states Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #13

No - but the senate should hold hearings based on the appearance of corruption. blm Oct 2013 #44

Here's what you need to do in several easy steps... Decaffeinated Oct 2013 #8

Perhaps you could practice what you preach? Oh, and then grab a dictionary LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #29

I'm good thanks... Decaffeinated Oct 2013 #45

Whatever gets you through the day LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #46

Although it won't be used I agree with the sedition argument because.. Bearheim Oct 2013 #11

So if father refuses to buy his daughter concert tickets he kidnapped her Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #19

this is your justification for charges of sedition? really? DrDan Oct 2013 #12

I agree with you and I find the people who get on their high horse and put you down, (and me and Maraya1969 Oct 2013 #14

All of these arguments remind me of Christian "scientists"... Decaffeinated Oct 2013 #15

If people threaten to use Violence DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #26

And last I remember, Mrs Second Amendment remedies lost badly NuclearDem Oct 2013 #41

Chose your battles TexasProgresive Oct 2013 #16

You seem to be equivocating around what "this" refers to. Warren Stupidity Oct 2013 #18

To those who say, "This is the dumbest post I've ever seen" Jeff In Milwaukee Oct 2013 #21

Yeah, it's stupid. Dr. Strange Oct 2013 #51

Excellent points. Are you a constitutional law professor? (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #22

Is somebody on DU saying that? LWolf Oct 2013 #23

There are at least a dozen threads everyday making that claim. former9thward Oct 2013 #38

I can't say that I've missed much. LWolf Oct 2013 #47

weak. nt aikoaiko Oct 2013 #27

OK, who wants to argue this before a judge? dairydog91 Oct 2013 #33

Beyond stupid n/t RZM Oct 2013 #35

Preposterous n/t cthulu2016 Oct 2013 #36

None of which has even the slightest to due with the rules of the House NuclearDem Oct 2013 #42

the problem is DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #55

You forgot Michael Hastings Throd Oct 2013 #54

wow. impressively clueless. utterly, shockingly clueless. cali Oct 2013 #57